Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

ESPN does not want Luck in Carolina

MHS831

By MHS831,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

MHS831 Grand Master

MHS831

Posted
Posted

I am getting a little sick of ESPN covering every possible scenario involving the #1 pick except Luck going to Carolina.

First, last night, the announcers kept making comments that he should return to school. Did not mention the Cats once.

Then today, Mortenson suggested that Carolina will stick with second round pick Clausen and trade the pick-- it will create a bidding war like no other.

Then they discussed that Denver will pull a Manning/Elway to get him by hiring Harbaugh.

Are they suggesting a Lebraun-type conspiracy? A plan to extort a player by creating a behind-the-scenes network designed to beat the system? The fact that they thought this and said it out loud on National TV is cheap and shows what slimeballs and scum ESPN hires. Why not cover the most probable scenario, which is Luck going to Carolina because the Panthers have a need at QB? Shallow sleeze balls. Just want to plant seeds and corrupt the sport that they feed on. If ESPN was ethical at all, they would fire these scuzzy bastards. Pricks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Matthias Proficient

Matthias

Posted
Posted

It's because we most likely won't have the personnel to challenge Luck to be the greatest. Harbaugh is one of those guys that can do so, yet all sources keep saying Carolina isn't interested in Harbaugh. Plus, we are a small market team. What is there to get excited about in Carolina? (This is their thinking.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Fiz Newbie

Fiz

Posted
Posted

actually ESPN does want andrew luck in Carolina because it would create an outlet through which it could reach an up until that point apathetic fan base.

NFL interest in down in the Carolinas and ESPN loses ad revenue through television and radio advertising.

Bringing in Luck would increase it.

there is no reason for them to want luck to land in an already large, established market.

for more information about the absolute basics of capital check out marx.org/kids

Link to comment
Share on other sites
2jakefansinva Newbie

2jakefansinva

Posted
Posted

It's because we most likely won't have the personnel to challenge Luck to be the greatest. Harbaugh is one of those guys that can do so, yet all sources keep saying Carolina isn't interested in Harbaugh. Plus, we are a small market team. What is there to get excited about in Carolina? (This is their thinking.)

C'mon man........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Aussie Tank
      Anyone know XL’s drop % rate?

      By Aussie Tank · Posted

      After the Chiefs game a 6'5 X would really help in the Red zone. I would also love to add Slayton in FA 
    • tukafan21
      Anyone know XL’s drop % rate?

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      But again, you can restock a defense through free agency much easier than offensive skill positions. Spend all our cap space on defense, take a true elite prospect who also happens to fit a position of need in T-Mac, and then use the rest of our picks on defense. Again, every season there’s a smattering of great DL, LB, and DB options in free agency, a Top 10 WR never hits free agency, ever.  The only way you get one is through the draft or giving up 1st round picks in a trade for one. If he’s there when we’re on the clock, he has to be the pick, he’s just that good.  
    • outlaw4
      Bryce QB School Week 12

      By outlaw4 · Posted

      It must be an early Christmas for JT O'Sullivan having Thielen back so he could put a coal in Thielen's stocking every chance he gets.  Honestly, the biggest surprise is not so much the anticipation. There were those moments here and there last year as well. It's that even that one positive quality he had seemingly vanished his first two games to where it looked like it was all but over, only for it to start coming back some until you get exclamation points all over this game film. And some of those throws were under a lot of duress, something I feel is something new. Finally, those deeper shots are starting to land. Not all of them, but enough that defenses may have to start respecting them. No guarantees whether this will end up as more of anomaly but I certainly hope it isn't. The Green Bay game was a sampler of what BY could be. Against KC, we got a meal. If we could start getting these meals regularly, we might actually have something to work with here.
×
×
  • Create New...