Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

only 39% of cap was spent on colts DEF


scpanther22

Recommended Posts

i dont know are number but i am sure it is way more than that.with that said more money invested for a meeks DEF should mean a huge inprovment for next year...

i whould like to what meeks does with a team that emphasis DEF unlike the colts..i think this could pay off big for us.only thing is i whould like to see more blitzing like philly.but dont count on it..

58% on off for colts

39% on DEF

the rest for special teams...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

lol where's that guy that was trying to tell me that most of the colts pay was spent on the defensive side of the ball? haha.

i never said most of their money was spent on the defensive side of the ball but you already knew that :)

are you still butt hurt from me dragging you all around that thread?

oh also this is only projected for 2009 and will certainly change as contracts are restructured, players are cut, retire, or are traded, and their first round pick is spent on defense, as polian as hinted.

harrison for example is probably going to be cut/traded

Furthermore, there's the big picture, the overall team structure and salary cap situation. Offense accounts for about $71.1 million, almost 58 percent, of the Colts' $123 million salary cap allowance for 2009. The defense accounts for about $47.8 million (39 percent), with the rest devoted to special teams.

http://m.indystar.com/news.jsp?key=395790&rc=col

oh also it's ludicrous to think that just because the Panthers spend more on their defensive players that meeks will perform better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i never said most of their money was spent on the defensive side of the ball but you already knew that :)

are you still butt hurt from me dragging you all around that thread?

oh also this is only projected for 2009 and will certainly change as contracts are restructured, players are cut, retire, or are traded, and their first round pick is spent on defense, as polian as hinted.

harrison for example is probably going to be cut/traded

http://m.indystar.com/news.jsp?key=395790&rc=col

oh also it's ludicrous to think that just because the Panthers spend more on their defensive players that meeks will perform better.

Uh, you never dragged me around the thread. You replied to me 1 time and it didn't even address what I was talking about. You replied to someone that said most of their money was spent on the offense by bringing up the contracts of Mathis and Freeney. Then I said the contracts of Manning, Harrison, Wayne, Addai, Clark, and Saturday combined was not more than Mathis and Freeney combined. You retorted by talking about this year's contracts when we were talking about 2008.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Him and Sanders are the only QBs I would consider in the first round. I won’t be upset if we take Sanders, unlike some people on the board. Both have potential to be really good NFL QBs if the teams can develop them.  But as we have seen teams are not willing or are unable to now properly develop rookie QBs. 
    • I remember the last time we had a Cam at QB in Charlotte
    • Because Young is so historically bad that it just skews too far outside the normal deviations that perspective is easily lost. That or they just don't want to believe it.  The struggles last year would have been more about the infighting and poor roster building or idiot owner's hiring practices than with Stroud. He wouldn't have been as good but he wouldn't have been ruined here and the pressure was not Carr-esk if you take out the Young created portion from his playing style.  Dude is a young guy on a team coached by a Defensive guy building a good D but not building up the O in year 2 of his HC 1st time gig. Seems familiar... Go look at his output this year and not just some crappy Thursday night implosion game, I would take that in a second and never ever look back every time without a shred of doubt while eating 4 of those games a year with a giant smile on my face. 
×
×
  • Create New...