Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Draft X they said!!

Jaxel

By Jaxel,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Jaxel Veteran

Jaxel

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Or we could have drafted...

Mike Williams: 61 receptions, 924 yards, 10 touchdowns

OVER

Armanti Edwards: 0 receptions, 0 yards, 0 touchdowns.

I heard maybe 1 or 2 complaints about us not drafting that guy... versus atleast a hundred between the other two...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
theyhateme45 Newbie

theyhateme45

Posted
Posted

Point is, Seahawks and Rams have had receiver problems and if those 2 can't get on the field with what they are working with then it speaks better to the two we got.

The thing is those teams have options, and did not have to go to a rookie. We did not have viable options...

Like i said, I believe had we drafted Marty and Tate they would have been starting or the #2 and #3 in games SS played, and would have put up similar numbers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jaxel Veteran

Jaxel

Posted
  • Author
Posted

It's called a depth chart and most teams don't have rookie WR other than first round picks anywhere near the top of it. Seattle's QB situation has been better than ours but not many other teams. Can't judge rookie WRs at completely different spots on depth charts.

Lafell and Gettis techincally didn't start out at the top, but due to bad players such as Jarrett, and injuries, we went the route of starting it... Sorry but in a numbers and production game, so far those 2 are showing more than the two people were crying that we didnt' get.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jaxel Veteran

Jaxel

Posted
  • Author
Posted

The thing is those teams have options, and did not have to go to a rookie. We did not have viable options...

Like i said, I believe had we drafted Marty and Tate they would have been starting or the #2 and #3 in games SS played, and would have put up similar numbers.

What options? They've been plucking WR's off of peoples practice squads all season.. you don't know what your talking about...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
theyhateme45 Newbie

theyhateme45

Posted
Posted

It's called a depth chart and most teams don't have rookie WR other than first round picks anywhere near the top of it. Seattle's QB situation has been better than ours but not many other teams. Can't judge rookie WRs at completely different spots on depth charts.

Exactly, The difference is if Marty has a bad game the Rams have alternatives they will put in the game, When Lefell had a bad game... well there is no alternative so he plays again next week. Good or bad they got opportunities. Wr's on other teams don't have that luxury.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
theyhateme45 Newbie

theyhateme45

Posted
Posted

What options? They've been plucking WR's off of peoples practice squads all season.. you don't know what your talking about...

They have Danny Amendola... Mr All around player, Laurant Robinson, and that Gibson kid... All 3 of them had been there and playing from the start of the season Not to mention Clayton before he got injured.... That's what's called alternatives... None of those guys were signed off of anybodys practice squad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...