Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Verdict: 2001 vs 2010


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

Our offense was at least decent in 2001, even if Weinke loved to throw those high INTs. Our defense kept letting us down late. We were in most games.

Very few games this season were close enough for our defense to let us down like in 2001. 2001 was easily the better year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stats could be used to say which team performed worse, but that's not so much what I care about.

I'm more interested in which one hurt more to watch (for those who sat through both).

This one was worse to watch, and it hurt a helluva lot more. Most of the games were not even competitive, whereas, in '01, the games were in question until late in the game (at least).

TBH, I'm not disappointed in the players (for the most part), I feel like they gave it their best. The ball bounced the wrong way at every break in the game, and the team struggled at the point of attack on offense and defense.

The thing about football, is there's always next week, and there's always next season. If you don't like what happened today, there's always a place for improvement, and a way to get there. Go Cats.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...