Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

It is Quiet...Too Quiet: Thanks Dilworth Neighborhood Grille?


MHS831
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, CanadianCat said:

I mean the point was exactly that, that its insinuated that the Tepper's meddled in the draft process. Thus forced the pick to be Young. My point is Young was the best graded player that draft year. 

but it was not about Bryce and his grading--that had absolutely nothing to do with the point--he and Stroud were simply the players who were on the table when the Teppers' input became so visible.  The point was to humorously create a piece to  ask if the Teppers are still meddling.  If the angle gave you that impression, it was not the intent, and a re-read might clarify that fact.  And this was written to be casual and humorous--like the power point and oxygen chamber.  A restaurant owner putting up a sign and the owner stops to argue with him?  Basically, this is a joke.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, frankw said:

The Tepper's are meddlers. We all know it.

There was some talk that he "learned his lesson."  Did you see them at pro days this year?  I did not, but I did not see much coverage of Panthers at pro days.  Last year, no first round pick--Teppers not meddling--mad at sandwich shop signs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree, owners should stay out of the process of making picks. But... owners gonna own.

If a billionaire wants something, nowadays they get it, even a gig as Vice president un-elect.

Honestly, though, I've been saying we need an overhaul of the entire scouting department (college and pro levels) for close to a decade now. It's sad to say this but we've been crap at it since Hurney left. And man, that wasn't a big hurdle to clear for those that followed.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, MHS831 said:

There was some talk that he "learned his lesson."  Did you see them at pro days this year?  I did not, but I did not see much coverage of Panthers at pro days.  Last year, no first round pick--Teppers not meddling--mad at sandwich shop signs. 

I've been very critical of the Tepper's. But. If they are actually learning and evolving then great. I will give them credit for it.

My issue is though I'm just not seeing any wholesale changes. Same draft scouting staff. Hired the worst GM in franchise history's righthand man. Our first round pick last year Xavier Legette was handpicked and publicly endorsed by Bryce Young's father. Our 2nd round pick was an absolute vintage classic Panthers pick. From there largely meh. Then we have the situation of Evero sticking around again after being forced on our first year head coach last year. To me the Tepper's are still behind the scenes pulling strings until proven otherwise.

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

but it was not about Bryce and his grading--that had absolutely nothing to do with the point--he and Stroud were simply the players who were on the table when the Teppers' input became so visible.  The point was to humorously create a piece to  ask if the Teppers are still meddling.  If the angle gave you that impression, it was not the intent, and a re-read might clarify that fact.  And this was written to be casual and humorous--like the power point and oxygen chamber.  A restaurant owner putting up a sign and the owner stops to argue with him?  Basically, this is a joke.

I mean, it was pretty funny that they did that.. Then we all learned that Tepper cannot take a joke (or people wearing hats). 

I fully support people trolling billionaires. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The spat with the restaurant owner while ultimately harmless was as good of a glimpse into David Tepper's thought process and overall approach to owning a sports franchise as anyone needed. I've got a lovely bridge to sell anyone that would believe that thin skinned middle aged adult man would sit back and let someone else make any and all decisions for a team he paid billions for.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, CanadianCat said:

I mean, it was pretty funny that they did that.. Then we all learned that Tepper cannot take a joke (or people wearing hats). 

I fully support people trolling billionaires. 

I agree.  and I wonder if it left a mark--this is the first time we have had a first round pick since the young/stroud draft---I thought the power point with Dan Morgan ordering the oxygen chamber to help him recover would have gone over better--either it was not funny or people did not realize that he tried it during his playing days to help recover from injuries, etc. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, frankw said:

I've been very critical of the Tepper's. But. If they are actually learning and evolving then great. I will give them credit for it.

My issue is though I'm just not seeing any wholesale changes. Same draft scouting staff. Hired the worst GM in franchise history's righthand man. Our first round pick last year Xavier Legette was handpicked and publicly endorsed by Bryce Young's father. Our 2nd round pick was an absolute vintage classic Panthers pick. From there largely meh. Then we have the situation of Evero sticking around again after being forced on our first year head coach last year. To me the Tepper's are still behind the scenes pulling strings until proven otherwise.

good points. 

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

It does seem like the Teppers are learning.  They have definitely become less visibly involved in the football operations of the team since 2023.  Hopefully it is what it looks like.

yeah, and I think Frank's point is they seem to be pulling strings just being less visible about it.  I was embarrassed to see them at Pro Days in 2023. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

yeah, and I think Frank's point is they seem to be pulling strings just being less visible about it.  I was embarrassed to see them at Pro Days in 2023. 

I think David Tepper got embarrassed pretty extensively that year.  How poorly the year went.  Firing Frank after less than a full season.  Throwing a drink on a fan.  Maybe his behavior hit a threshold where he reflected on his actions.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

I think David Tepper got embarrassed pretty extensively that year.  How poorly the year went.  Firing Frank after less than a full season.  Throwing a drink on a fan.  Maybe his behavior hit a threshold where he reflected on his actions.

Yes--when you put it all together, wow.  People can get rich at one thing, yet they get their asses kissed so much for being rich, they associate it with supremacy in other walks of life.  Start thinking that money makes them smart and right. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Shocker said:

Tepper stops meddling and the team starts improving almost immediately.  He has to know that now but yeah…thanks for the signs!

Fellow Huddlers talking about firing his coach (He was part of the Rhule hire too), throwing drink on a fan, yelling at roadside signs, etc.  He then seemed to disappear to some degree.  Last year, no first round pick, and he was probably behind the trade to the Bears--and this year, I have not seen him.   Frank and others feel that he has just become the man behind the curtain; others think he has stepped aside.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think Tepper made huge strides in this area last year as well. It’s obvious he has trust in the Canales/Morgan pairing - and rightfully so.  
    • Did you really just source your own Twitter account? LOL 
    • There are times during the prolonged, pre-draft process that you abandon your gut feelings and allow yourself to be persuaded by popular opinion.  My gut was more consistent with what Morgan et al did than my conclusions.  Here is why (my theory): 1. With social media, one opinion is often repeated until it seems like the majority. The more you see it, the more you feel that your gut was wrong.  You second guess and conform at times.  In January, if you told me TMac would be there at 8, I would have been very interested because there weren't other WRs like him and he was dominant on a bad team.  I let the comments about film, questions about separation, etc. sway my opinion.  I started comparing him to Kelvin Benajamin in my head (work ethic). So I took him off my board. 2.  Morgan said something rather profound (parphrasing): "We did not want to be restricted by need."  IMO, the biggest needs were Edge, S, WR.  We assume that the biggest need is aligned with the first overall pick in most situations.  Everyone was talking about Jalon Walker because Micah Parsons is a similar beast and Abdul Carter would be off the board.   However, as a former coach at Salisbury High School and someone who vaguely knew Walker's father before he was born, I still could not see the fit here.  I think Walker is a great person and will be a good pro, but he did not fill our needs.  TMac was the best player who filled a primary need and we could not find another TMac-type player in the draft.  However, there would be second round Edges that were, in my view, potentially as good NFL players.  The first through early third rounds were loaded with edges.  3. Since edge was our biggest need, Morgan added 2--one in the second and one in the third.  They mentioned referring to statistics to see the likelihood of a player being available at 55 as opposed to 59, guiding their trade practices, for example.  I noticed the talent grades did not drop as much for edge players into early round three and the WR market dropped rapidly.  Morgan mentioned that they only had 3 second round WRs on their board, which is why TMac in round 1 was smart.  I also posted the following stats from the internet and it is never wrong: First-round picks in the NFL Draft have a higher success rate than those in the second or third rounds. Whilethe first round boasts a success rate of around 58%, the second round is nearly as good at 49%. However, the third round sees a significant drop, with only a 25% success rate.    So let's do math.  If you draft 1 edge at #8 he has (since it is early in the round) about a 60% chance of being successful.  Morgan would earn 6 success tokens for his Edge need. If you draft an edge in the second, Morgan would earn 5 success tokens for his edge need. If you draft an edge in the third, Morgan earns 2.5 success tokens for his edge need. So Morgan gets the draft's WR unicorn in the first round and by using the second and third round selections, addresses the biggest need by collecting 7.5 success tokens instead of 6.   Morgan has a high probability of being successful with 2 of 3 of the teams' biggest needs.  He was not needs driven, however, he was market driven.  Supply and demand.  He was smart. Had we drafted Walker, a player who is a stud and can be most effective as an ILB with versatility, I am not sure we successfully addressed the need.  Other players with first round talent either lacked college productivity or had red flags.  We would HAVE to target one of the 3 WRs the Panthers had listed as second round possibilities (I am guessing Higgins and Burden III and Beck--all far inferior to TMac).  Higgins and Burden III were drafted before they were within trade range and it is not surprising that happened--leaving the Panthers with a only Beck at pick 57.  Putting that in perspective, Edge Scourton was taken at pick 51 and Mike Green was taken at pick 59. However, there were 5 edge players taken in the second round.  There were 6 edge players taken in round 3.  Value TMac was rated #4 by PFF and J. Walker was rated #25.  Meanwhile Beck (WR), the only second round WR available in round 2 (I should point out that Tre Harris was rated by PFF at #66, and he was taken in the mid second) was rated 40.  Had we taken an edge in round 1, it is likely we would have ended up with J Walker (#25) and in round 2 Beck (#40).  Instead, we drafted TMac (#4) and Scourton (PFF #29) and Princely (PFF #50). https://www.pff.com/news/draft-2025-nfl-draft-board-big-board In terms of trade value points, the PFF scores value Morgan's first and second round vs. the probably first and second round (had we taken Walker and then the best WR available in round 2 Beck): So you see, Morgan ended up, using the PFF ranking system, doubling the value he got from the first two picks than if he had taken Walker instead of TMac and then drafted the best WR left at pick 51 or 57. In terms of what actually happened, TMac was drafted at #8 and Scourton was taken at #51--this suggests that the Panthers got great value vs. the PFF rankings.  Walker was taken at #15, (10 places higher than his rankings) and Beck was taken at 58, (18 places lower than his rankings.)  So how did Morgan do if you compare drafting Walker/WR vs TMac/Edge?   So Morgan's value was still 24% higher than it would have been had he drafted Walker.  Of course, this does not factor in trades, etc.  but you get the idea.
×
×
  • Create New...