Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Next Head Coach


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

rivera is the only guy i like at all of the guys that have been listed as potentials, but still i'm not loving the idea.

i need to be sold.

also, manusky? really? ugh. let's set that bar REAL low.

crap like that is going to make it really hard to stay a panthers fan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It always feel the panthers get screwed out of everything.Just dont know what to say about our organization, We have had a 3 winning seasons out of 9 years. An they are still trying to do the same Bull.I really think they care about money then winning.Also not giving Harbaugh the little power that he wanted had to be he reason why he is not interested in our team.But Rivera will be the coach more then likely. 49ers are expected to have a head coach by Friday,More then likely Harbaugh is the Guy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Eh, Harbaugh's looking for a Pete Carroll deal: $6.5+ mil/yr with control over personnel decisions. I would be wary of giving that kind of deal to a guy like Cowher and much more than wary to a college head coach with no coordinator experience. At least Carroll had previous NFL head coaching experience.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm thinking about the language that's been used when they said going after "top NFL assistants"...not specifically coordinators. This is why I think 2 people have some appeal for us: Keith Butler & Winston Moss. I hope we hear one of their two names in the near future

Otherwise, I'm still liking McDermott & definitely would not be mad with Rivera. I think we should all be a little more positive about this. Not getting Harbaugh has been a likely scenario from the beginning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

fyi, Ron Rivera is ALOT more aggressive than John Fox. So you would be wrong.

I'm not overly fussed about getting an offensive minded coach, I just want somebody that is aggressive and plays to win. I want half-time adjustments, even if we are winning. I want to be hated like the Pats for running up the score. Off the top of my head, the last time we won a meaningful game comfortable was against the Chiefs a few years ago when we shut them out.

If we go defensive minded again I want the HC to leave the offensive side of the ball to the OC and I want the OC to be an ex-QB or ex-WR coach. I'm happy to stick with a run-heavy offense but I want teams to atleast consider our passing game when they game-plan for us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • Well, we got our answer on Army today.
×
×
  • Create New...