Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Your bad thought for the day


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

I think the Colts DB coach spot is filled, but I could be wrong.

Fuel on the fire from PFT.

When he was the head coach of the Jets, Edwards was introduced to Raheem Morris, who was then an assistant at Hofstra. Edwards offered him a minority internship, which Morris points to as the break that got him into the NFL coaching ranks.

Edwards could return to Tampa

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Bucs secondary under his coaching was pretty good. If he goes back there, I do believe it'll have an impact on them; and by extension, on us.

I'd feel good if he came here, but it'd also be fun to see him go to ESPN (maybe knock Keyshawn down a few pegs).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They've made a couple good hires. Word just now that they got Pete Mangurian for their OL coach. He's been in charge of some good lines. Most recently he was working with the Pats TEs,

Offensive coordinator right now seems to be a choice between Chan Gailey and Ken Zampese. Gailey was the architect of the Steelers attack back when they had a dominant offense. Zampese's was also a candidate here the year we hired Jeff Davidson. His dad Ernie is the one who created the dominant attack the Cowboys used in the 90s.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Speculation here, as it has many other places, proved false.

Buccaneers | Baker hired to coach defensive backs

Jim Flynn and Scott Reynolds, of PewterReport.com, reports the Tampa Bay Buccaneers have hired former Denver Broncos linebackers coach Joe Baker to be their next defensive backs coach.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...