Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

This years Draft deeper than last years???


micnificent28

Recommended Posts

I've seen lots of post comment on how this years draft is weak talent wise.

I think this years draft is deeper infact than last years draft which was deemed best in the last few years.

Look at the number of good qb prospects coming out,where locker would have been number one last year he's looking at third best right now.

A class that includes Luck,Mallet,Locker,Cam Newton,Kellen moore,Ponder,Devlin and other elite talents.

The running back position is shallow and not as deep as last season.

The wr position has the potential to be one of the best ever with green,jones,baldwin looking like first rounds.

you have talents like micheal floyd,Blackmon,Broyles guys who any other year would have been first rounders.

The OL isnt so great this year but the Defensive ends are pretty good.

You have Bowers,Clayborn,Quinn,Bailey and others making it elite.

Solid dts and linebackers with great cornerbacks.

With the right picks in place team could make vast improvements this year.

I just wanted to see what the board thought about depth in this years class.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last year was by far deepers than this year's. Locker would have been a 2nd round pick last year. Don't believe the media on draft value.. they are not always right. Sam Bradford would have been the #1 pick regardless if Locker came out. In fact, Luck and Mallett would be the only 2 1st round QBs that you just named.

The draft is fairly top heavy this season with not a lot of depth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last year was by far deepers than this year's. Locker would have been a 2nd round pick last year. Don't believe the media on draft value.. they are not always right. Sam Bradford would have been the #1 pick regardless if Locker came out. In fact, Luck and Mallett would be the only 2 1st round QBs that you just named.

The draft is fairly top heavy this season with not a lot of depth.

that's the feeling I'm getting....we have two third rounders (compensation for Pep) so don't be surprised if we move back up into the second round

Link to comment
Share on other sites

that's the feeling I'm getting....we have two third rounders (compensation for Pep) so don't be surprised if we move back up into the second round

We can't trade comp picks, so I'm not sure what we would have to give up to get back into the second would be worth it. See Everette Brown.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've seen lots of post comment on how this years draft is weak talent wise.

I think this years draft is deeper infact than last years draft which was deemed best in the last few years.

Look at the number of good qb prospects coming out,where locker would have been number one last year he's looking at third best right now.

A class that includes Luck,Mallet,Locker,Cam Newton,Kellen moore,Ponder,Devlin and other elite talents.

The running back position is shallow and not as deep as last season.

The wr position has the potential to be one of the best ever with green,jones,baldwin looking like first rounds.

you have talents like micheal floyd,Blackmon,Broyles guys who any other year would have been first rounders.

The OL isnt so great this year but the Defensive ends are pretty good.

You have Bowers,Clayborn,Quinn,Bailey and others making it elite.

Solid dts and linebackers with great cornerbacks.

With the right picks in place team could make vast improvements this year.

I just wanted to see what the board thought about depth in this years class.

You are either ten years old,are legally retarded, or you just don't watch any football and just look at stats. (that still wouldn't explain your third grade writing)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the fact that you said certain positions aren't that deep this year just clarifies that last year was in fact deeper. there was no real weak position last year, because all the best players declared for the draft early so they could get payed in the event there was a rookie cap installed or there is no football next year.

Every position was deep last year. there was second round talent and even some third round talent that could have been first round talent any other year. poo was wild.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the fact that you said certain positions aren't that deep this year just clarifies that last year was in fact deeper. there was no real weak position last year, because all the best players declared for the draft early so they could get payed in the event there was a rookie cap installed or there is no football next year.

Every position was deep last year. there was second round talent and even some third round talent that could have been first round talent any other year. poo was wild.

Just because i don't know the exact numbers on those positions. last years class was not good at lb at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The draft is fairly top heavy this season with not a lot of depth.

i agree with this.

thats a lot of the reason i've said we should trade back into the 2nd and then trade away all the picks we are allowed to trade after the 3rd round for vets.

with the exception of the top tier of talent, this isn't an incredible draft at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We can't trade comp picks, so I'm not sure what we would have to give up to get back into the second would be worth it. See Everette Brown.

are you implying Hurney is scared to trade away future picks? haha I didn't say I agreed with it I just said don't be surprised

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just because i don't know the exact numbers on those positions. last years class was not good at lb at all.

Can you do us all a favor and never post again? :thumbsup:

All of your posts are fact-less and opinionated with no intelligent material whatsoever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This year looks good for CB and WR, and as mentioned is pretty topheavy. After the top 10 talent drops off like crazy. There's going to be alot of reaching for players that aren't really worth the spot they're taken at. And the lineman class as an overall group looks terrible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This year looks good for CB and WR, and as mentioned is pretty topheavy. After the top 10 talent drops off like crazy. There's going to be alot of reaching for players that aren't really worth the spot they're taken at. And the lineman class as an overall group looks terrible.

I totally agree. If we trade back from #1 (if we get it) I hope we get some picks next year in return:yesnod:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last years draft was reminiscent of the 04 draft, where we got Gamble, and a ton of All Pros went in the first, and throughout.

This years draft reminds me of the draft of a year after: some nice players, but weak overall. Also, two good players who play positions not really worth the top three overall, went in the two and three respectively lol--Ronnie Brown and Braylon Edwards. Sorta sounds like what could happen this year with Peterson and Green.

One good thing we may have going for us is that the early enrollee Pac-10 QB who SHOULD have went no 1 overall that year is now the best QB in the NFC, so maybe history will somewhat repeat itself...somewhat. Y'know as long as we dont screw up like San Fran and take the overrated running QB who cant throw

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'd give it a C mainly because of Brooks.  If we just didn't have a 2nd I'd argue B to B+ tbh. Brooks was a bad gamble, tho one that could still pay off long term. Yes XL only has 400 yards but... Look who is throwing him the ball. And I think he isn't a "true #1" but he's been able to consistently get open. Hands definitely need to be cleaned up.  But he should end the year with 500-600 yards. Like you said - Sanders looks great.  Get him a better QB / more time with a QB and I think he's gonna impress. We added a couple rotational players on D that have both made plays and show promise for the future from later rounds. So I'd say, Brooks really hurts this drafts grade. It'll be interesting to see how it progresses over the next 3 years. I've overall really liked Morgan's FA acquisitions, so...
    • Oh he would absolutely flourish. It’s the panthers way. It’s no different with coaches. Sometimes they reach their expiration date, go somewhere else, and find new success.  Similarly to Burns, how long to wait for the light to finally turn on?  Market forces will demand a salary that the panthers can not responsibly match. Sliding him to guard will fit his skill set better, but he has played LT for 3 years. He will receive offers from other teams wanting to pay him LT money.  At guard, he won’t start with what they have paid Hunt and Lewis. Center then?? Dunno. Maybe? He will become a backup by default once they draft their stud LT. I doubt Dan just stands pat. That’s not his MO.  So where does this put him? Can you match what other teams will offer for a backup LT/guard? Do you dish out franchise LT $ on a guy who still needs significant improvement in pass protection. This team will be DOA in the playoffs with the very first team who has a formidable speed rusher. What if he has hit his ceiling in pass protection already and they sign him long term? It’s a big gamble either way. 
    • We're in a great position to see just how big of a misstep it would be, having made so many ourselves
×
×
  • Create New...