Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cam Newton????????


micnificent28

Recommended Posts

I'm hearing alot of chants for Luck,Mallet,and Locker.

I havent heard One person mention the name of Cam Newton.

It seems to me he has the most upside of any player in the draft and maybe the strongest arm. Not to say Luck isn't great but I havent been hearing good things about his deep ball.

I just dont want to end up with clausen 2.0 with a arm like chad pennington.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm hearing alot of chants for Luck,Mallet,and Locker.

I havent heard One person mention the name of Cam Newton.

It seems to me he has the most upside of any player in the draft and maybe the strongest arm. Not to say Luck isn't great but I havent been hearing good things about his deep ball.

I just dont want to end up with clausen 2.0 with a arm like chad pennington.

I suggest you actually watch the games before you post. :idea:

And the rest of us don't want a qb with a brain as small as yours.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm hearing alot of chants for Luck,Mallet,and Locker.

I havent heard One person mention the name of Cam Newton.

It seems to me he has the most upside of any player in the draft and maybe the strongest arm. Not to say Luck isn't great but I havent been hearing good things about his deep ball.

I just dont want to end up with clausen 2.0 with a arm like chad pennington.

I will also add Andrew Luck is only a sophomore and plays against Pac-10 defenses which arent known for being great. Im also trying to remember the last great underclassman QB to come out of the Pac 10. I think Luck is gonna be a good player, but if he comes here he wont. He's already being set up for failure by our fanbase being compared to guys like Brady & Manning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will also add Andrew Luck is only a sophomore and plays against Pac-10 defenses which arent known for being great. Im also trying to remember the last great underclassman QB to come out of the Pac 10. I think Luck is gonna be a good player, but if he comes here he wont. He's already being set up for failure by our fanbase being compared to guys like Brady & Manning.

Right as opposed to a QB who plays in an offense taylor made to make him look good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will also add Andrew Luck is only a sophomore and plays against Pac-10 defenses which arent known for being great. Im also trying to remember the last great underclassman QB to come out of the Pac 10. I think Luck is gonna be a good player, but if he comes here he wont. He's already being set up for failure by our fanbase being compared to guys like Brady & Manning.

Mark Sanchez

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will also add Andrew Luck is only a sophomore and plays against Pac-10 defenses which arent known for being great. Im also trying to remember the last great underclassman QB to come out of the Pac 10. I think Luck is gonna be a good player, but if he comes here he wont. He's already being set up for failure by our fanbase being compared to guys like Brady & Manning.

Aaron Rodgers.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will also add Andrew Luck is only a sophomore and plays against Pac-10 defenses which arent known for being great. Im also trying to remember the last great underclassman QB to come out of the Pac 10. I think Luck is gonna be a good player, but if he comes here he wont. He's already being set up for failure by our fanbase being compared to guys like Brady & Manning.

you can say that about SEC qbs as well. chris leak, The Golden Calf of Bristol, jamarcus russel, matt flynn, perriloux, jason cambell....the list goes on.

Luck runs a pro style offense, with a head coach who played nfl quarterback succesfully, and has all the makings of a very good qb. he has the physical tools, hes from stanford, hes smart etc etc

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will also add Andrew Luck is only a sophomore and plays against Pac-10 defenses which arent known for being great. Im also trying to remember the last great underclassman QB to come out of the Pac 10. I think Luck is gonna be a good player, but if he comes here he wont. He's already being set up for failure by our fanbase being compared to guys like Brady & Manning.
not all underclassmen, but the PAC10 is kind of underrated when it comes to QBs coming out. currently they have these guys starting: sanchez, palmer (had a good run i'd say before injuries), aaron rodgers, matt cassel.

right now the Pac10 has more QBs starting for them than other conferences except for maybe the ACC.

SEC has the manning boys, cutler, and stafford. for such a tough conference, you would think they would have more QBs starting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I suggest you actually watch the games before you post. :idea:

And the rest of us don't want a qb with a brain as small as yours.

You might wanna check more game film before u flame...the only questions about luck are his arm strength.

When anyone asks about lucks arm strength the answer that come up is always meh...or its ok

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If Canales has helped Bryce a “poo ton” and this is what we have then what’s the fuging point? And the offense wasn’t humming with Dalton in there either, except against the raiders who’ll likely be firing their coach after this season.  XL is probably the fourth best looking receiving option on the team right now behind thielen, Coker, and sanders. I don’t think anyone would disagree with that. Who cares about total receiving yards when everyone else has missed time and there’s like 180 yards of receiving a game.  and lmao they were “believing” shut the fug up. They lost and for the most part those games were all the defense shutting down the other team. The chiefs turned around and gave up an actual impressive stat line to Aiden O’Connell and I not even the most delusional raiders fans think that means anything. Bryce did nothing against the eagles, the Bucs are a mash unit, and any one of us could have done that Bryce did against the giants and saints.  And as far as who they’d get, they didn’t have any trouble hiring the guy you’re tripping over yourself to defend. They also could have hired Dan Quinn, who’s actually succeeding with a young qb.  And people are acting like the risk of getting paid for not working for five years is a negative. Canales is going to spend the next half a decade getting paid to watch porn in his Bible camp office.
    • the Dallas game definitely quelled the hype. his biggest issue will always be his size, and that shows when he gets sacked. he's simply not big or strong enough to protect the ball. even in the KC game, he fumbled it on a basic sack and thank god icky landed on it. INT's are going to happen, most fans don't understand that tipped balls and wrong routes account for most interceptions. but the wet-bar-of-soap type fumbles upon contact are a huge reg flag. the common theme with players like Darnold and Mayfield who previously played for us and are now excelling makes me want to practice patience more when it comes to the QB position. I think Bryce bought himself another season, perhaps with more weapons. I do like the idea of adding a QB whether that's a FA or mid round rookie. if the same mistakes occur next season and we see no further growth or most importantly, wins, then it will be time to move on. just a quick reminder though, football is not an individual sport. QB is just one position, albeit the most important. 
    • There's some big assumptions in here - first, I think Canales HAS helped Bryce a poo ton. To pretend he hasn't is asinine. Has he fixed him?  I mean, the dude looks like he could perhaps be a backup or low-end starter now, whereas he looked like he didn't belong in the NFL a year ago. You're talking about a coach that brought one of the worst NFL QBs of all time to a point where he may actually be a low-end starter. That IS impressive. Second, the bolded. Come on - given the offense, the dude is far from "trending towards bust." He definitely needs work but he's shown an impressive ability to get open. He's contributing to an anemic offense. The dude is our leading receiver (though he'll be #2 in yardage by end of season by a little, as Thielen does better per game).  As to his coaching, he had this team competing and believing against 3 of the better teams in the NFL, despite the lack of talent, and despite our QB situation.  Yes, things fell apart vs DAL, and he was outcoached. But that will happen with young coaches IMO.  I don't think it indicates he cant' be better. The idea of "pulling off the bandage" is ridiculous. Who would want to coach here if we fired this guy after one season? 
×
×
  • Create New...