Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Guys, do you agree with this?


Matt Foley

Recommended Posts

Since i'll probably never meet any women on the huddle I feel safe saying this.

If I see her from the front the first thing I analyze are the tits, then the face, then the ass.

If I see her from the back first, the first thing I notice is her ass,then i come around to see the tits and face.

and if their overweight and don't carry it well then i dont notice anything unless i'm drunk and lonely..at this point i will analyze the lips

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i look at her left ring finger....
Honestly, only if I'm past vaguely interested. Usually it goes: Eyes, boobs, cheekbones, rear, smile, hands (ring glance here, once I've seen if they have man-hands or not), that spot on her neck right above the collarbone (whatever the hell that's called...), legs, eyes again.

Not a fan of red lipstick unless it's worn at night and done in a classy way. Some women can get away with it, but quite a few others can't. It depends on how much else is worn with it, but for me, the less makeup on a woman, the better. Personally, I think all of it is garbage for the most part, but every now and then, I like my woman to get "dressy" like I'd wear a nice suit to a function.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly, only if I'm past vaguely interested. Usually it goes: Eyes, boobs, cheekbones, rear, smile, hands (ring glance here, once I've seen if they have man-hands or not), that spot on her neck right above the collarbone (whatever the hell that's called...), legs, eyes again.

Not a fan of red lipstick unless it's worn at night and done in a classy way. Some women can get away with it, but quite a few others can't. It depends on how much else is worn with it, but for me, the less makeup on a woman, the better. Personally, I think all of it is garbage for the most part, but every now and then, I like my woman to get "dressy" like I'd wear a nice suit to a function.

i look at her ring finger to see if the rock is nice....if so, ill attempt to steal it.....

why? what do you look at the ring finger for? :confused:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You and I both know there isn't a coach we could or can still hire that can "fix" Bryce Young. Even at mighty Alabama with one of the best modern coaches in college football history Mac Jones was still a better QB than Bryce Young. Mac Jones.... We already know how you feel about Canales on a personal level so in that regard you wanting him fired is not news. You don't have to disguise it behind this shroud of rabble about not fixing Bryce Young. To his credit he somehow had us competive against the Chiefs and the Eagles on the road with #9. But no coaching staff can overcome their starting QB turning the ball over 4 times. We definitely have developed some of our younger offensive pieces. And as far as Evero goes he has earned criticism and if he's fired so be it but in his defense many of us said in the offseason this defensive roster was a disaster waiting to happen given the resources we spent on the offense while neglecting the defense. That was Dan Morgan's plan. He swung too hard toward offense to salvage the Bryce Young trade. That's on him. We can scream about XL all we want but at least he's actually been on the field for the most part. The Brooks pick was a luxury pick at the time and now it is a Hurney level blunder. Dan Morgan has gotten a lot of early praise here when in reality he's unequivocally deserving of significant criticism. But if you say that some people get up in arms because he's a former Panther. Big whoop. He has just as much to prove this upcoming season as Canales. That's why to me in my own personal opinion I say one more season and then if it's more of the same say goodbye to both.
    • It's a decent vid with compelling reasons for his opinion. But, my thing is is that you simply can't draft McMillan thinking he is a surefire WR1. There are questions. His 40---rightly or wrongly---will play a part. I'd think that his splits (which will speak more to his game translating to the pros in my mind) are more important.  As much as you're trying to sell us that McMillan is a don't-overthink-it-type-of-player, I wouldn't say that's the case. Workouts will play a part in all of this.  At this point, I like the thought of Tetairoa. That's as much as I can give you right now.
×
×
  • Create New...