Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Guys, do you agree with this?


Matt Foley

Recommended Posts

Since i'll probably never meet any women on the huddle I feel safe saying this.

If I see her from the front the first thing I analyze are the tits, then the face, then the ass.

If I see her from the back first, the first thing I notice is her ass,then i come around to see the tits and face.

and if their overweight and don't carry it well then i dont notice anything unless i'm drunk and lonely..at this point i will analyze the lips

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i look at her left ring finger....
Honestly, only if I'm past vaguely interested. Usually it goes: Eyes, boobs, cheekbones, rear, smile, hands (ring glance here, once I've seen if they have man-hands or not), that spot on her neck right above the collarbone (whatever the hell that's called...), legs, eyes again.

Not a fan of red lipstick unless it's worn at night and done in a classy way. Some women can get away with it, but quite a few others can't. It depends on how much else is worn with it, but for me, the less makeup on a woman, the better. Personally, I think all of it is garbage for the most part, but every now and then, I like my woman to get "dressy" like I'd wear a nice suit to a function.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly, only if I'm past vaguely interested. Usually it goes: Eyes, boobs, cheekbones, rear, smile, hands (ring glance here, once I've seen if they have man-hands or not), that spot on her neck right above the collarbone (whatever the hell that's called...), legs, eyes again.

Not a fan of red lipstick unless it's worn at night and done in a classy way. Some women can get away with it, but quite a few others can't. It depends on how much else is worn with it, but for me, the less makeup on a woman, the better. Personally, I think all of it is garbage for the most part, but every now and then, I like my woman to get "dressy" like I'd wear a nice suit to a function.

i look at her ring finger to see if the rock is nice....if so, ill attempt to steal it.....

why? what do you look at the ring finger for? :confused:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • There's some big assumptions in here - first, I think Canales HAS helped Bryce a poo ton. To pretend he hasn't is asinine. Has he fixed him?  I mean, the dude looks like he could perhaps be a backup or low-end starter now, whereas he looked like he didn't belong in the NFL a year ago. You're talking about a coach that brought one of the worst NFL QBs of all time to a point where he may actually be a low-end starter. That IS impressive. Second, the bolded. Come on - given the offense, the dude is far from "trending towards bust." He definitely needs work but he's shown an impressive ability to get open. He's contributing to an anemic offense. The dude is our leading receiver (though he'll be #2 in yardage by end of season by a little, as Thielen does better per game).  As to his coaching, he had this team competing and believing against 3 of the better teams in the NFL, despite the lack of talent, and despite our QB situation.  Yes, things fell apart vs DAL, and he was outcoached. But that will happen with young coaches IMO.  I don't think it indicates he cant' be better. The idea of "pulling off the bandage" is ridiculous. Who would want to coach here if we fired this guy after one season? 
    • Whatever they are in totality the cowboys are beat up all to hell on both sides of the ball and even that was too much for lil Bryce to overcome.  Bryce defenders have to hype up every other team and trash every other part of the panthers just because of the situation they’ve put themselves in. 
    • JB had a first round grade in the eyes of a lot scouts based on HIS TALENT LEVEL. If not for the injury he would have gone higher in the draft, possibly between the middle and the end of round 1. To get him just before the 50th pick is a steal. He'd be on a 4 year deal. You can't even renegotiate until the end of the season 3. You're basically paying him nothing for 3 seasons. I don't buy into all back are interchangeable. No they're not. You have average backs, good backs, then your great-exceptional backs. The latter category doesn't grow on trees. If a back is special it pays to keep them. The key is knowing the difference between the first two categories and the third one.
×
×
  • Create New...