Mike Goodson

[Pox 08]

Triple Trouble.

[CatMan72]

First off you are almost certainly mentally handicapped.

Age is a factor Williams will be 28 at the start of next season very close to the terrible "30" that backs hit... Stewart and Goodson will both be just 24.

...and we still have 28 under his rookie contract for a few more years, while 34 will be a highly sought after FA.

[KillerKat]

Goodson has been epic over these last 3 games and Stewart showed up today... doesn't bode well for DeAngelo

I dont see how it doesn't bode well for DeAngelo. He's faced tougher defenses and gotten over 4 yards per carry while Stewart has been under 3 the whole year until today against the Browns. If anything it just helps Stewart's trade stock.

[Kevin Greene]

Tag Willams and trade him.

You're assuming DWill will sign his FT contract. Did you see what happened with Julius Peppers the last 2 off seasons?

The smarter play might be trading Jonathon Stewart (assuming someone is crazy enough to give us at least a 2nd for him) and re-sign DWill.

No matter what, we can't let DWill walk without value back at us.

[Kurb]

Talent leaves all the time in the NFL KG.

[pstall]

glad you guys are finally eating my cooking on him

[Davidson Deac II]

Doesn't what we do with Williams have to do with a couple of things. One, what does he want? If he wants a ton of money, and we have three good backs in Sutton, Stewart and Goodson, then I doubt we would be willing to pay him to much. And a lot depends on what the new contract looks like.

[woody]

When did everyone start wanting Goodson over Stewart?

[Kevin Greene]

Talent leaves all the time in the NFL KG.

True, but you can be clever like the Patriots and Richard Seymour and have that talent leave on your own terms. Trade to the Raiders for a future #1 while he's still under contract.

Moral of the story?

The Pats have a #1 draft pick inbound.

The Raiders?

Well they had to Franchise Seymour to keep him and find themselves in a Julius Peppers situation.

Be proactive, not reactive.

DWill is a special talent, do what is necessary to keep him or get compensation.

[Kurb]

True, but you can be clever like the Patriots and Richard Seymour and have that talent leave on your own terms. Trade to the Raiders for a future #1 while he's still under contract.

Moral of the story?

The Pats have a #1 draft pick inbound.

The Raiders?

Well they had to Franchise Seymour to keep him and find themselves in a Julius Peppers situation.

Be proactive, not reactive.

I agree with your logic, but such things seem to be exceptions to the rule.

[WCABBall]

we cant let dwill go without anything. I like the trio of Stewart, Goodson, and sutton but would love instead to see Deangelo, Goodson, and Sutton and trade Stewart for a 2nd rounder or even a third round pick.

Just cant keep losing players without any compensation. Kills your franchise.

[Delhommey]

Goodson has had some terrific plays, but as much as he fumbles and gets his QB killed, I'm not willing to turn it over to him just yet.

[Kevin Greene]

Sutton has had some terrific plays, but as much as he fumbles and gets his QB killed, I'm not willing to turn it over to him just yet.

Sutton has 7 carries this year and no fumbles, the roster is an unforgiving mistress.

[WCABBall]

sutton is your third back in a williams, goodson, sutton trio. I am sold on Goodson. He still has potential fumble issues but the guy has been solid. Could def carry the load as the 2nd TB in a two TB system. The question is what to do about Williams and Stewart. Which one leaves. I have a feeling its Williams and we get 0 for him. Thats the fear. Franchise the guy and get a long term deal with him and trade Stewart for an extra pick in the third round to take OL or DT.