Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Can we cut Richard Marshall


panthers1789

Recommended Posts

I say cut Lucas, let Marshall have a shot at the #2 CB Spot. Last year, he filled in for Lucas I believe and did a good job. I think he'd thrive in a starter position. He'd train harder, study harder, etc. He's a GREAT tackler too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hes horrible, everyone likes to bash Lucas, but forget that Marshall gets burnt even more than Lucas.

Cut or trade Marshall, draft a corner in round 2 or round 1(if we get a 1st rounder for Peppers).

I think that you do not cut your young and taleted players. I know that Marshall regressed this past year but he still show's a lot of promise.

Until we pick a new D cordinator I would think that we wouldn't cut any of our D players, unless someone is obviously overpaid or underachieving, because you do not yet know what your DC's scheme is going to be.

What if we cut Marshall and Lucas and the new DC wants to run an aggresive bump and run with his CB's? Well Marshall and Lucas both excel as physical corners. We just screwed ourselves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder if Marshall's regression had anything to do with Tim Lewis....

and yeah, I'd get rid of Lucas before Marshall. The latter is cheaper, and younger, and if someone's going to get burnt, I'd rather it be the cheaper younger one.

if he had Herm coaching him, he'd turn into a complete stud.

he makes less annually than dante wesley

lol, awesome then

He's looking to get paid this year! I can see him leaving pretty easily....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Tetairoa McMillan.   The last 28 1st overall picks were either a QB, DE, or OT. Seeing as I don't think we'd take an OT in the 1st and give up on Ickey as an LT yet and there doesn't seem to be a clear overall #1 type of QB or DE pick this year, it very well could be a non conventional #1 overall this year, at least in regards from the last almost 3 decades of drafts. If we didn't have Horn, I'd be more open to Hunter as a CB at #1, but we have him so another CB wouldn't be how I'd use a #1 pick.  And as much as I love Legette, if we have SB contending aspirations, I don't think Legette is a #1 on a team like that, but he damn sure is an elite #2 on a team like that.  He's more of the Smith/Higgins/Waddle to Brown/Chase/Hill (in terms of role/impact, not style of play of course). T-Mac is going to be the top ranked WR on every team's board in the end.  He is going to be a true outside #1 WR who is viewed as a consensus Top 5 WR in the game by his second contract in the same way guys like Jefferson and Chase have done.  His height combined with his speed, athleticism, and hands are near impossible to find all in one player, there is a reason his generally used comp is Mike Evans (although as he's not as thick, I personally see him more as an AJ Green). Yes, as an Arizona alum I've admitted to having bias towards the player to begin with.  But he's also someone very widely being put into the Top 5 in mock drafts lately and most of them have him as the first non QB offensive player being taken, so it's not really THAT much of a homer pick on my part anyways. If a QB or DE truly separate themselves as being a can't miss prospect come draft day, I'm open to that discussion, but until then, or if it doesn't happen, T-Mac is my pick 100 times out of 100.
    • Logjam, indeed! Makes me nervous.
×
×
  • Create New...