Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

You Guys Were Terrible

Fooball

By Fooball,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Fooball Newbie

Fooball

Posted
Posted

hosts last night. No more parties at your house for us, thanks.

Way to make our notorious defense look like a girls flag football team in front of the entire country.0009.gif

Your coaches put together the best possible offensive game plan against us and then the players executed......end of story. Took advantage of Jovan Haye missing from our D line and then made our backfield look like they forgot how to tackle. Williams and Stewart were awesome, props to them. Right up the gut, play after play.

OK, so we split crappy games at each other's house, and may meet again in the playoffs. That would mean it's back to our turn to win, right? :D

You guys came to play and deserve the props for a royal ass whuppin.

I guess that means it's time for me to ask for seconds, because I'm still hungry. Grilled medium well with a bloody mary to wash it down, please.

getmsg-29_cgvo.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Fooball Newbie

Fooball

Posted
  • Author
Posted

It was beautiful! Good post foe. I did run my mouth to Bucs fans before the game last night and they were good sports. I wouldnt mind you guys losing one more game just in case we slip up somewhere.

Yea, if I was you, I would want a cushion,too. With the "Gee eye aye en tee ess's" coming up. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rubberpantz Newbie

rubberpantz

Posted
Posted

Bucs had an "off" night and our O line and Smash and Dash had a good one. NFC South is one heck of a division.

What was up with Dunn? I've never seen him drop so many before. But we had our share of drops as well...Hoover doesn't usually drop either.

i think by the end when most of those drops were accumulating, the bucs had just given up and were ready to get on their plane back to warm TB... cant say i blame them because for them, the 4th qtr was UGLY...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Jackie Lee
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By Jackie Lee · Posted

      Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...