Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Everette Brown, Hardy, Goodson...


SnarkAttack

Recommended Posts

FINALLY Everett Brown had an impact on this game. A few tackles, a sack and some pressures. That draft day trade still looks bad, but it looked far worse earlier in the season. Hardy played well - I think he will be an impact player in the near future. Finally, Goodson is obviously playing lights out - racking up 100 yd games with the dame o line and defensive scheming that stymied Stewart/DeAngelo. I'm predicting we won't go into next season with the same group of RB's. I saw sign Williams and trade Stewart if we can get a 2nd for him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

our core of talent is going to be solid as hell next year. this awful year may turn out to have a few disguised blessings... lots of reps for future starters who otherwise wouldn't have gotten a chance to contribute.

all three of those players could be future pro-bowlers if they reach their potential.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hands to the face.

:cool:

pressure leads to incompletions, turnovers, and sacks. don't judge the quality of a DE by his sack statistics.

Yes, Brown had an impact. He forced Flacco out of the pocket and into quick throws more than once. He had a couple of nice plays against runs where he didn't let the T set the edge, forcing the RB back inside.

Good game all around, unless you're just looking for reasons to hate.

He had an average game to me. I guess that's great compared to the rest of the defense/team :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:cool:

He had an average game to me. I guess that's great compared to the rest of the defense/team :(

Perhaps you, like a lot of fans, have unrealistic expectations.

There's are a lot more factor to performance that the glory stats. Sacks are vastly overrated, not enough credit is given to the rest of the demands of the position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Perhaps you, like a lot of fans, have unrealistic expectations.

I am sorry, what? Dude cost us a 1st AND 2nd round pick. Unrealistic Expectations? C'mon man. As far as I am concerned he should be right there with Charles Johnson on this defensive line. One sack, missed tackles...a bunch of spin moves that led to him being out of position. No thank you.

He isn't worth what this franchise wasted on him. He should've been picked in the 3rd round maybe the 4th.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
    • You're really gonna pass up the opportunity to make a joke about skidmarks in underwear here?  Alright fine.
×
×
  • Create New...