Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

You've got to be kiddin me...

PantherPhann

By PantherPhann,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

PantherPhann Newbie

PantherPhann

Posted
Posted

B. St. Pierre gives us the best chance to win, wtf! I believe that Pike or Armanti could've done as good as he has and if they couldn't then Pike needs to be gone. He's been on the roster learning the playbook through training camp, preseason and the regular season and he doesn't have the coaches confidence more than a stay at home dad thats been in the NFL 8 years and thrown 5 passes. What does that say about our draft choices/our method of evaluating draft choices. This is getting beyond laughable....

Link to comment
Share on other sites
grateflday Collaborator

grateflday

Posted
Posted

Armanti was dressed today, he was the emergency QB

Sorry, let me re-phrase my question :-)

Why is Armanti not playing WR at all today?? The Panther's traded a now high second round pick for this kid and I dont care if he is being converted from QB to WR.... this team is going nowhere and the offense already sucks. Get Armanti playing time!!!

Fox is an A$$.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PantherPhann Newbie

PantherPhann

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Hey, if he remains listed as a WR, how many snaps can he take in a game? Is there a limit to how many times a player can line up in a wildcat type play? Whatever that limit is, if there is one, we should take advantage of that just to see what he brings to the game. It's crazy to have used a 2nd rnd pick on someone that may not even play this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
grateflday Collaborator

grateflday

Posted
Posted

LOL at people thinking Pike or Armanti would've done any better out there.

First, Pike and Armanti can look or do any worse. Second, watching this team has been brutal enough to begin with. At this point I would much rather see our draft picks playing, especially one we traded a high second round pick for than a scrub QB who for 8yr was never good enough to be higher than a 3rd string QB, couldnt even make a roster this season, has been sitting home for 11 months and only on the team for 4 days and two WR's we picked up off practice squads.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • LinvilleGorge
      2024 College Football Thread

      By LinvilleGorge · Posted

      Well, we got our answer on Army today.
×
×
  • Create New...