Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What's the point of playing St. Pierre?

RockECU

By RockECU,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

RockECU Newbie

RockECU

Posted
Posted

I don't see the logic behind this. If only to save Fox's job with a possible win? We are 1-8, we are out of the playoff race. Shouldn't we be building our young QBs by getting them valuable experience rather than playing some scrub who was a third stringer for Baltimore a while ago?

This logic is just beyond me. Anyone else feel the same way?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
RockECU Newbie

RockECU

Posted
  • Author
Posted

What was the point of having John Fox coach the team this year? There is no point to anything the Panthers do.

Not having to pay his salary and another coach's in preparation for an uncapped year. It's a much better move than starting St. Pierre. The Foxy move at least had our future in mind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Brooklyn Bully Newbie

Brooklyn Bully

Posted
Posted

What's the point? Armanti is too small, and Pike sucks horribly. There is next to no difference between the three, and one isn't even supposed to be a QB. The other will hold clipboards for life. So that leaves one suck ass fool who has at least been in the game before and knows a thing or two. So Fox went with that guy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SpeedOFLight Collaborator

SpeedOFLight

Posted
Posted

I mean really. You sign a career backup to start. 1st start in what 8 years...really? Why? We are the laughing stock of the NFL. Who cares what people "think" of Pike and Edwards. Why do you take them and don't give them a chance..but you sign someone off the streets and let the start. This just hurts my head...its silly and I am tired of watching this team play. I love this team and so grateful we have them but this poo has to stop.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Brooklyn Bully Newbie

Brooklyn Bully

Posted
Posted

I mean really. You sign a career backup to start. 1st start in what 8 years...really? Why? We are the laughing stock of the NFL. Who cares what people "think" of Pike and Edwards. Why do you take them and don't give them a chance..but you sign someone off the streets and let the start. This just hurts my head...its silly and I am tired of watching this team play. I love this team and so grateful we have them but this poo has to stop.

I think the answer is: holy hell did we draft for crap in 2010.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
RockECU Newbie

RockECU

Posted
  • Author
Posted

What's the point? Armanti is too small, and Pike sucks horribly. There is next to no difference between the three, and one isn't even supposed to be a QB. The other will hold clipboards for life. So that leaves one suck ass fool who has at least been in the game before and knows a thing or two. So Fox went with that guy.

Pike is better than St. Pierre. From what I've seen anyway. Edwards should be given a chance. What do we have to lose?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • rayzor
      Happy Thanksgiving You Filthy Animals

      By rayzor · Posted

      Just had Thanksgiving meal with a couple dozen family and friends. I lucked out and got one of the smoked turkey legs. Stuffing, mashed taters and gravy, green bean casserole, sweet potato casserole, kale, smoked ham, chicken and rice, corn, lima beans, cranberry sauce, and great people. My brother got his guitar out and we got to singing. Lots of actual conversations with people I hardly  ever get to see, haven't seen in a while, or who I never met before. Just a great moment to remember.
    • Mr. Scot
      Thanksgiving Games

      By Mr. Scot · Posted

      3-8 would be a higher win percentage than 3-9
    • Mr. Scot
      Some love for Steve Wilks

      By Mr. Scot · Posted

      Same... With the personnel the Niners had, that defense could have been historically good in the right hands. Under Wilks they were certainly good, they didn't quite rise to that level. Honestly, I see Wilks kinda like I see Rivera: fantastic person, decent head coach. Skill wise, phenomenal DB coach, so-so DC. His greatest strength is his leadership. Hard to find many better in that department. In the Xs and Os / execution area though, not as good. Bottom Line: Wilks is the sort of coach that needs a staff that excels in those aspects of the game where he's weaker. But, like Rivera, I don't know that he scouts assistants very well. That as much as anything might be why he's not in the NFL now.
×
×
  • Create New...