Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

4-4 or 5-2 or 3-3-4?? oh the possibilities.

TANTRIC-NINJA

By TANTRIC-NINJA,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

TANTRIC-NINJA Community Regular

TANTRIC-NINJA

Posted
Posted

I just got on here and I think we solved Pi.....because how many threads can we have about this mythical 3-4, or 34 or trenta cuartro.

Lets give the whole league a big CRISS ANGEL MINDFREAK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! by doing the ol....4-4, starting CJ on the line and adding Pepps as the roving terminator in the middle of the field.

Teams would be confused and when we get 22 sacks a game! Mind freak!! will scream over the PA replacing the screaming Panther......or

We will just use the ol' 4-3 or 43 or cuartro dela hoya. Ola! or olay....or Happy Chalupa...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Icege
      PFF ranks the 2025 starting QBs

      By Icege · Posted

      I'm arguing that should those supposed deficiencies, like height or pocket footwork, be as consequential as you and others have claimed, then there would be a clear, observable impact in the data. That's not unreasonable. For example, batted passes are often used as a size-related concern (see: Baker Mayfield), yet Bryce ranked among the lowest in deflections at the line. If his stature is such a limitation, why isn't it showing up there? Or are you suggesting that's why his passing yards fall short of your expectations? If the latter, I would hope that you're not discounting yards left on the field due to drops (of which he led the league in).  Also, asking for specific, measurable benchmarks isn't aggression... it's accountability. If that feels uncomfortable, it might be worth reflecting on how much of your anti-Bryce argument is grounded in subjective perception rather than objective metrics. So, again: do you have any specific KPIs beyond total passing yardage, height, and weight that you consider relevant to evaluating whether a QB is top-10? If you want to add YPA and passing yards per game to those metrics, that's fair, just be clear about it. But let's not pretend that asking for clarity is some kind of provocation. I'm simply trying to understand the actual criteria... not just the vibes.
    • PantherChris
      Ocho Cinco loves one of our CBs

      By PantherChris · Posted

      Jackson actually played quite well for a #2 CB #54 in PFF coverage ratings 12 pass break ups solid in run defense..... Hes gonna be targeted just because Jacyee IS being avoided.
    • kungfoodude
      PFF ranks the 2025 starting QBs

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      Yeah, these arguments are getting twisted to the point that it's just an airing of old grievances for the 100th time. No matter what happened in the past, no matter what the "trajectory" is, Bryce has to show why he was a number 1 overall draft pick.  If people didn't like Cam and what he did for us at QB, I hate to see what poor Bryce is gonna get if he doesn't reach Manning-esque heights. 
×
×
  • Create New...