Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFC South Pick Challenge (WEEK 9 RESULTS)


conrad77

Recommended Posts

Week 9 Results 11/7/2010

2010 Weekly Champs:

Week 1 STULAAKE (T)

Week 2 Robb4242 (A)

Week 3 hardenmj (A)

Week 4 germanbuc (T)

Week 5 bill_kir (T)

Week 6 crzcjn (N)

Week 7 Primetime 89 ©

Week 8 Birdman Jr (A)

This week:70 played.

Tampa 28, New Orleans 21, Atlanta 13 and Carolina 8.

Winners against the spread: Bucs, Saints, Cardinals Ravens.

Most teams picked: Saints 58, Bucs 45, Cardinals 44, Dolphins 38.

The tiebreaker was 305. 3 picked it on the money: jhyler12 (A), danr5160 (N) and Cadillac Attack (T).

This weeks Team Champ was: Tampa .759, New Orleans .663, Atlanta ..536 and Carolina ..321

This weeks Champ was Cadillac Attack (T) who beat out 12 others as he picked the tiebreaker exactly.

Tampa has bragging rights this week.

One item of interest. Another good week. 11 players lost ground this week to the leaders. 57 stayed the same or improved their percentage. 2nd week in a row this ratio has happened.

5 more newbies joined this week. Two of them went 4-0 (BreesTDShockey (N) and The Saint ©. Nice start!

4-0 13

300 TheSaint ©

278 BreesTDShockey (N)

259 dabestbank (N)

245 thefifthwall (N)

242 1sparkybuc (T)

267 benir0 (T)

333 BucLifer (T)

305 Cadillac Attack (T)

286 Jack Rabbit Slim (T)

237 JM2 (T)

230 nmkinley (T)

211 Uncle Stan (T)

225 X-Factor (T)

3-1 28

219 cportcuz (A)

230 gritsblitz (A)

290 jddurden (A)

190 papaswag (A)

287 Aussaint (N)

250 BRWhoDat34 (N)

205 daMixter (N)

230 jhoniten (N)

277 lildyce504 (N)

250 mrwrench77 (N)

282 NOSaint504 (N)

231 SAINTS#12 (N)

256 scedotal (N)

289 St4ever (N)

233 Surviving Saint (N)

291 AcuraT (T)

228 Biggs3535 (T)

237 BucNGator (T)

234 Bucweiser (T)

241 Conrad77 (T)

247 Diehart fisherman (T)

271 Hate (T)

275 jcarruth (T)

242 John Galt? (T)

285 NavyBuc93 (T)

268 TbayBucs (T)

237 TbC-Bucs (T)

250 TonyClifton 3.0 (T)

2-2 18

264 Birdman Jr. (A)

255 BirdzEyeView (A)

260 Mississippi DirtyBird (A)

294 rcky_mtn_falcon (A)

0 Taijis (A)

265 Tandy (A)

288 turnerdburner (A)

193 panther55 ©

255 replive ©

254 A-Clown ©

301 Cruzilla (N)

400 crzcjn (N)

305 danr5160 (N)

325 heybigmatt (N)

255 bucmoon (T)

295 clintro (T)

298 STULAAKE (T)

306 Usmcbuc (T)

1-3 10

274 dmite (A)

237 hardenmj (A)

305 jhyler12 ©

296 pantherrice ©

274 TheRealDeal ©

290 DJA101 (N)

265 hjl26 (N)

320 jbourque (N)

277 BucPirate1 (T)

198 germanbuc (T)

0-4 1

325 TyHillPanthers ©

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Week 9 YTD 11/7/10

Prior year's Champs: (Tampa only 2006-2009)

2006 No records available

2007 .661 replica

2008 .659 T

2009 .589 bizkitlimped

To date 283 different players have played. Unfortunately, over half have only played 1 or 2 weeks.

Needed 18 games to qualify this week. Next week you will need 20. For the year, 40.

YTD TEAM STATS W-L:

Tampa .533

New Orleans .516

Atlanta .486

Carolina .458

REMEMBER THAT THE CHAMP IS DECIDED ON PERCENTAGE. NOT THE NUMBER OF WINS.

This weeks qualified leaders (Played 18 games or more) at or above .500: 51 players made the list this week-44 over .500.

The leader this week is BRWhoDat34 (N)

New Orleans and Tampa share bragging rights this week.

THE LEADER BOARD

(In alpha screen name order within percentage)

.750 24-8

BRWhoDat34 (N)

.714 20-8

X-Factor (T)

.708 17-7

burger40 (T)

.694 25-11

John Galt? (T)

.688 22-10

STULAAKE (T)

.679 19-9

lildyce504 (N)

.666

24-12

Benir0 (T)

BucLifer (T)

TbC_Bucs (T)

16-8

nmkinley (T)

.656 21-11

hjl26 (N)

.643 18-10

JM2 (T)

Robb4242 (A)

.625

20-12

Diehart fisherman (T)

germanbuc (T)

jcarruth (T)

NavyBuc93 (T)

St4ever (N)

thefifthwall (N)

15-9

cportz (A)

.611 22-14

rcky_mtn_falcon (A)

.600 12-8

Tutto ©

.594 19-13

dabestbank (N)

.583

21-15

Jack Rabbit Slim (T)

jhoniten (N)

14-10

mrwrench77 (N)

sandiegobuc (T)

.571 16-12

Broussard Bullet (N)

replive ©

.563 18-14

TonyClifton 3.0 (T)

.556 20-16

Aussaint (N)

BucNGator (T)

Hate (T)

TbayBucs (T)

.542 13-11

dmo-dio (A)

.536 15-13

bizkitlimped (T)

.531 17-15

Biggs3535 (T)

Cruzilla (N)

dmite (A)

gritsblitz (A)

Uncle Stan (T)

X-Clown ©

.528 19-17

bucmoon (T)

conrad77 (T)

SAINTS#12 (N)

.500

18-18

1sparkybuc (T)

panther55 ©

16-16

AcuraT (T)

14-14

heybigmatt (N)

12-12

smike (N)

Surviving Saint (N)

10-10

bucboy (A)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • his height, size and arm will forever cause problems and limitations...that is what it is.  I think to a degree, the law of averages is just coming into play a bit with him.  So as he plays more and more, you just flat out get the decent days mixed in too.  Which is just going to happen. 
    • Good point. He's definitely better in 10-15 yards. I think that's his biggest improvement. But he wasn't 3-10 +15, he was 3-7, with at least one drop (minor but still). And with multiple passes at 14 yards completed. This passing chart doesn't look like at By one, lol. He threw more "deep" passes than Mahomes (NOT comparing him to Mahomes in a skill way lol), or at least more beyind 10 yards.
    • Karlaftis and Danna have been pretty inconsistent so teams have been doubling Jones and able to contain their pass rush.   But the good thing is that yesterday, we schemed well against Steve Spags Defense, Canales married the surrounding personnel with his QB through play designs within his comfort zone and was able to get downfield at will.  He was able to execute higher difficulty throws and look a lot more comfortable.  It tells me that Canales has a good system in mind, and had an edge gameplanning wise against Spagnuolo - which is nice to see.  It's a bit to see-saw at times with either going way too pass heavy or way too run heavy, but I think he's finding out what works.  It takes time to have it come together, and sure, I could see regression happen against a better front-7, but this was good for the entire system gelling.    
×
×
  • Create New...