Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Quit Beating around the bush and play Armanti!!!


AdrianR

Recommended Posts

It won't make any difference. we've used 3 QBs and seen the same results. It doesn't matter who the QB is. This team sucks, they aren't any good, and a QB change will not matter.

None of the previous QBs could run. You add that element to any offense and it puts an extra strain on the defense. Look at what Vick (a running QB) is doing to defenses this year. Compared to Kolb (a non running QB), it is better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This offense is soooooo brutal and dismal to watch. I do not think I have seen anything so horrible in all my years of watching football. Watching this team on TV and at that stadium is agonizing and painful. This team is going nowhere fast. You know what,,,,, at the next home game I wouldnt complain if Armanti was playing. Dress the guy at least!!! I have no idea how good this guy is and understand completely how ridiculus it is that we are even having this discussion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This offense is soooooo brutal and dismal to watch. I do not think I have seen anything so horrible in all my years of watching football. Watching this team on TV and at that stadium is agonizing and painful. This team is going nowhere fast. You know what,,,,, at the next home game I wouldnt complain if Armanti was playing. Dress the guy at least!!! I have no idea how good this guy is and understand completely how ridiculus it is that we are even having this discussion.

The only thing you've probably ever seen him play is WR and punt returner, two positions that he has never played before he got to the NFL. Play him at QB...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only thing you've probably ever seen him play is WR and punt returner, two positions that he has never played before he got to the NFL. Play him at QB...

Play him at QB...... that is fine with me at this point. That game today was brutal and painful to watch - again. I just find it sad that just getting a 1sst down on a drive is considered a success, and we are super lucky to just get at least one. This offense has not had one sustained drive all season. It either a big play or nothing.

Now anybody reading my posts, I am not calling for Armanti to start. I am just saying if he was in there I would not complain. It might at least give us something exiting to watch.

How sad is it the Panther season has come down to this. :willy_nilly:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can promise you that Armanti at QB would make Clausen look like Joe Montana.

I'm all for having Armanti run the Mountaineer package as a change of pace.. but he could not be an every-down QB in the NFL.

Clausen wouldn't look like Joe Montana if he had a face lift and found his jock strap. Clausen is not the QB of the future. If so we had better get used to this as a good season. Everyone that I know that watched Notre Dame games saw that. There was even an article a few weeks ago concerning the agents involved in the NC mess that admitted that there was payments made to hype Clausen. He is a "daddy's want-a-be". His dad hiring professional QB coaches for him starting in the 7th grade should tell you that he is not going to work out and that he has been overachieving to even get where he has gone. Any QB with real talent would be much more polished with all that help.

i feel exactly the same way. at the beginning of the season, if you had asked me if i wanted edwards to start at QB, i would have thought hell no, but honestly, at this point, i really dont see why it would be a big deal to give him a shot. jf he sucks, it wont be any worse than any of our other QBs, and at least armanti will be on the team next year, unlike matt moore.

Edwards only has an upside becoming the starting QB. Could not say that about any of the other QB's. Obviously there are some people that have their own agenda of thinking about why they do not want him to play QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • https://crm.ridemetro.org/forums/general-discussion/93d2fbe2-3dc1-ef11-b542-001dd80082b2
    • The reality is Bryce outplayed a Probowl QB vs a better defense with inferior weapons. IDK what else you can ask for from your #1 overall pick that you gave up the farm for 
    • Ah yes, the classic and timeless 'Big Time Throws' HOF metric. Gold star for Bryce and the other QBs that make Big Time Throws. That eyeroll aside, my position has always been that Bryce's ceiling is Bridgewater/Smith levels of effectiveness, which is not good enough to have a consistent shot at winning Super Bowls in today's NFL. My issue and concern with Bryce remains as it has always been - a lack of downfield dynamics. My position has also been that this is what really hampered the Saints with Brees at QB for the last nearly decade, the inability to truly attack downfield vs the top competition when the opportunities presented themselves. That is likely complicated somewhat by the receivers on the roster and time will continue to sort that out if the roster is effectively managed. After watching the second half yesterday there were some very good throws, chiefly the throw over the middle while taking the shot that absolutely should have been roughing and then the superbly-placed TD to Moore, but still only 10 points produced and an inability to really close it out. That complete whiff on the third down pass was an untimely mistake but the kind that happens to all QBs and I don't think that's really outside of Bryce's current range of possibilities on any given throw anyway. I chuckled at the irony given all of the 'clutch' talk recently, but that's not really here or there when assessing the throw itself. Yes, 30 points should be enough to win an NFL game, but the best teams have to be able to put up points and sustain drives when needed even if carrying an unreasonable part of the load. Getting 'close' with teams like the Chiefs and Eagles is to me more a signal of the limitations I mentioned earlier (Saints-esque inability to overcome the best competition) rather than an overly positive sign, and only time will tell if he and the team can move past that. Hopefully these final games show some increased dynamics and a continued growth toward true downfield effectiveness.
×
×
  • Create New...