Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What is Stewart's problem?


Kurb

Recommended Posts

This is my first guess too.

But why does it seem that other teams don't suffer as much when they are missing a player on the O-line.

It's not just run blocking. It's not just the RB's. It's a mix. But it's homerism at its best to blame it only on blocking. We've been without Otah before, and did fine. We've done all this before, injuries on the O-line, etc, and been fine. Stewart, and Williams (not as bad though) are missing holes, trying to cutback when they shouldn't, and just doing dumb things and looking scared to get hit.

The types of runs we do are pretty annoying too. I know Stew is a N-S runner, but a few outside runs won't hurt, we had only a couple today. Williams can run to the edges well but we don't even do that either. We don't run screens either, which I don't get, when we DO run them, they usually work out well. We're wasting Goodson here by not doing this.

And I don't care what anyone says, we are missing Hoover badly, and also Moose's blocking.

Running backs have dealt with bad lines and still are productive. The Rams and Stephen Jackson for example come to my mind.

I almost feel like Dwill/Stew are trying NOT to get contact, or someone told them to, as crazy as it sounds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmmm, DWill is averaging 1.1 YPC more than Stewart. 4.1 vs 3.0.

We went to a Super Bowl with Stephen Davis averaging 4.5 YPC.

I don't put this all on the line.

This is a good point... the line has serious issues, but there is something about Stewarts running this season that is different, but it's hard to put a finger on exactly what it is, which leads me to conclude that it is a combination of things.

Line problems, hesitation on his part, the play calls, he way the qb's hand off the ball, lingering injuries and/or mental issues, or a combination of all or some of those things.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh he would absolutely flourish. It’s the panthers way. It’s no different with coaches. Sometimes they reach their expiration date, go somewhere else, and find new success.  Similarly to Burns, how long to wait for the light to finally turn on?  Market forces will demand a salary that the panthers can not responsibly match. Sliding him to guard will fit his skill set better, but he has played LT for 3 years. He will receive offers from other teams wanting to pay him LT money.  At guard, he won’t start with what they have paid Hunt and Lewis. Center then?? Dunno. Maybe? He will become a backup by default once they draft their stud LT. I doubt Dan just stands pat. That’s not his MO.  So where does this put him? Can you match what other teams will offer for a backup LT/guard? Do you dish out franchise LT $ on a guy who still needs significant improvement in pass protection. This team will be DOA in the playoffs with the very first team who has a formidable speed rusher. What if he has hit his ceiling in pass protection already and they sign him long term? It’s a big gamble either way. 
    • We're in a great position to see just how big of a misstep it would be, having made so many ourselves
    • I didn't say I would have done it. I was just saying that I can see why some in the FO considered it. Everything was done to give Bryce weapons. Solidify the interior line thru FA. Get XL at WR in round 1 and then get the most talented RB in round 2. Take a TE in round 4, etc They were probably "assuming" he'd make a complete recovery during the 2024 season. I'm a skeptical person. I wouldn't have assumed he'd be ok in 2024. I personally would have taken another position in the 2nd for that very reason. But, if I were "influenced" to take him I would've argued to keep him off the field, especially seeing how things were going for us record wise. Conventional Wisdom says most backs don't get back to normal until two years after the ACL surgery. He was injured in Fall 2023. Having him suit up in 2025 would have been almost 2 years since the original injury. You have him for 3 year on low contract. If he balls out, you resign him for a couple of more years b/c he'd only have 3 years of tread on the tires. If he's ok but not great you let him walk. 
×
×
  • Create New...