Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Topic 1 - Huddle Mod Candidates..

Zod

By Zod,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

jasonluckydog Veteran

jasonluckydog

Posted
Posted

1. What are the three top attributes of a good mod?

2. What would you do to improve the huddle?

3. Who would you ban first?

1.Availability, Endurance and the love for justice and the American way

2.This is the greatest Panther site ever,why change it?

3.The 1st person who says we should sign Mike Vick next season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jaxel Veteran

Jaxel

Posted
Posted

1.) I'm fair, don't make brash decisions, don't clutter the board with dumb picture posts and flaming.

2.) I would keep the threads on topic. Get rid of threads that end up in picture or flame wars.

3.) Next Rams fan that signs up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Catdaddy Newbie

Catdaddy

Posted
Posted

you didn't number your answers. Disqualified! next...

Just saying, I know I have no chance so why number! But would like to see the cussing and pictures cleaned up some. We have a photo section ZOD makes very great, so no need for every avatar borderline xxx!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ladypanther Grand Master

ladypanther

Posted
Posted

1. A) Ethical

B) Objective

C) Loves the Huddle

2. Respond to destructive posts. Move smack to smack. Not tolerate personal attacks. ( Not that it is not being done now, although the last one sometimes goes on too long. That might be a factor of needing an additional set of eyes.)

3. Not looking for anyone...whoever is violating Huddle rules.

I love the Huddle. I believe people and systems go through tough times. Although I think the overall quality on the Huddle has been better, I believe it can still be better. How can you not want a forum who has given so much to needy kids to thrive? That is why I am here, and because of some people here I believe in. I want us to work, and I want us to be better. I have stayed despite the problems that have caused some others to leave. I believe in us and the good of us. I want us to grow and I want us to be very good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
tarheelblue89 Newbie

tarheelblue89

Posted
Posted

1. A) Ethical

B) Objective

C) Loves the Huddle

2. Respond to destructive posts. Move smack to smack. Not tolerate personal attacks. ( Not that it is not being done now, although the last one sometimes goes on too long. That might be a factor of needing an additional set of eyes.)

3. Not looking for anyone...whoever is violating Huddle rules.

I love the Huddle. I believe people and systems go through tough times. Although I think the overall quality on the Huddle has been better, I believe it can still be better. How can you not want a forum who has given so much to needy kids to thrive? That is why I am here, and because of some people here I believe in. I want us to work, and I want us to be better. I have stayed despite the problems that have caused some others to leave. I believe in us and the good of us. I want us to grow and I want us to be very good.

You're too smart for this place

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Jackie Lee
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By Jackie Lee · Posted

      Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...