Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

School buses doing 45mph in a 65mph


fitty76

Recommended Posts

Am I the only person bothered by this? How is having a vehicle doing 20mph below the speed limit on a highway safe? I don't know how many times I have almost got into a wreck having cars cut me off trying to get around these buses. This also creates unneeded traffic congestions. Something needs to be done about this.

And please spare me the "I don't care about the safety of children" argument. Going 20mph below the posted speed limit isn't safe for anyone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Am I the only person bothered by this? How is having a vehicle doing 20mph below the speed limit on a highway safe? I don't know how many times I have almost got into a wreck having cars cut me off trying to get around these buses. This also creates unneeded traffic congestions. Something needs to be done about this.

And please spare me the "I don't care about the safety of children" argument. Going 20mph below the posted speed limit isn't safe for anyone.

I know exactly what you are talking about. I-485 rush hour. It is a major problem and backs up traffic like crazy. It defeats the purpose for having the interstate. Start a petition and I'll sign it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I might agree with school buses staying off Interstates (although in some cases that would prove difficult), but there is no way I would ever agree with a school bus being allowed to go that fast. Its a fact, that the higher your rate of speed, the greater the chance that an accident will be lethal.

You must have kids or dont live in Charlotte. The problem is the buses are empty. They run the route for the kids and then take the interstate back with an empty bus at 45. Thats what f*cks up all the other drivers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I might agree with school buses staying off Interstates (although in some cases that would prove difficult), but there is no way I would ever agree with a school bus being allowed to go that fast. Its a fact, that the higher your rate of speed, the greater the chance that an accident will be lethal.

The buses I see on 485 are completely empty. Yet they still go 45mph.

And if you don't want the buses going that fast, then they shouldn't be on a highway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You must have kids or dont live in Charlotte. The problem is the buses are empty. They run the route for the kids and then take the interstate back with an empty bus at 45. Thats what f*cks up all the other drivers.

Where I live is irrelevant because Charlotte doesn't have some unique claim on traffic jams caused by school buses. I have lived in cities larger than Charlotte, and they usually have the same complaints. And I drive my kid to school. And when there is a bus on the road, I just bite the bullet, keep calm and stay behind it until I can pass safely.

Buses are made so they can't go above a certain speed. Thats the way it is, the way it will be for the foreseeable future, and the way it should be. To suggest that a bus full of 7 and 8 year old kids should be capable of doing 65 mph is setting the scene for an increased number of crashes that kill multiple kids.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Where I live is irrelevant because Charlotte doesn't have some unique claim on traffic jams caused by school buses. I have lived in cities larger than Charlotte, and they usually have the same complaints. And I drive my kid to school. And when there is a bus on the road, I just bite the bullet, keep calm and stay behind it until I can pass safely.

Buses are made so they can't go above a certain speed. Thats the way it is, the way it will be for the foreseeable future, and the way it should be. To suggest that a bus full of 7 and 8 year old kids should be capable of doing 65 mph is setting the scene for an increased number of crashes that kill multiple kids.

Empty buses. Empty buses. Empty buses. Did I mention the buses are empty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Where I live is irrelevant because Charlotte doesn't have some unique claim on traffic jams caused by school buses. I have lived in cities larger than Charlotte, and they usually have the same complaints. And I drive my kid to school. And when there is a bus on the road, I just bite the bullet, keep calm and stay behind it until I can pass safely.

Buses are made so they can't go above a certain speed. Thats the way it is, the way it will be for the foreseeable future, and the way it should be. To suggest that a bus full of 7 and 8 year old kids should be capable of doing 65 mph is setting the scene for an increased number of crashes that kill multiple kids.

Okay, if you don't want a bus going 65mph, then keep them off the highway. That's all I'm asking. If a bus can't go faster than 45mph then they don't belong on a highway. Maybe the bus drivers need to "bite the bullet" and take the long way home.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just admit that you don’t follow all the draft discussions on here. If draft results were so random, how come some teams tend to be perennial losers like us and some teams are perennial winners and it all starts with the draft? It’s almost comical these type of stupid responses. Oh, why aren’t you the GM? Gee I wonder since I work in a completely different field. How about you give us some examples of where the huddle consensus drafting was worse than our drafting from 2018 to 2025? I know I’ve given a ton of examples and you just shoot this generic poo of oh you couldn’t possibly done better as an armchair GM. Why don’t you dispute any of my examples? Let’s go to Brooks. I wanted Frazier at C because I still feel like that’s a hole. Other Huddlers mentioned DeJean at CB. Here’s why many of us didn’t want Brooks because 1) he might not play due to tearing his ACL late in the college season, 2) any scout/GM worth their salt would know that the 2025 RB draft class was loaded and 3) trading up multiple picks knowing 1 and 2 seems silly. Heck, after the draft, pretty clear that day 3 was where the RB value was. The huddle was right on Brooks and at most, we’ll get 2 years of Brooks while Hubbard is still under contract. If you know so much about the underlying machinations of the draft, you should be able to dispute the actual examples and how the huddle’s picks were just plain lucky and how Dan, Scott and Marty’s picks were just unlucky. Pulling the why aren’t you an NFL GM is a much repeated response when an actual reasoned response isn’t possible. Our drafting hasn’t been unlucky the past 7 drafts, it’s just been bad with lost of idiotic moves that were far worse than the huddle consensus.
    • I got y’all https://static01.nyt.com/athletic/uploads/wp/2025/04/09073220/2025-Beast-v02.pdf Th3!Be@$T!#2025
    • 100%!! Last year we focused completely on offense, and it made leaps, especially when Bryce settled in for the 2nd half of the season. We kept all those players and improved our RB stable this free agency! This year we focused almost entirely on D, specifically our run D. I expect it to jump to at least average, which would be awesome considering they are starting at dead frikin last. Our draft class from last year, however, doesn't exactly make me tingle. I know, I know..."traded away our first round pick, give them time to develop", but still. The 1 gem was Coker, a UDFA who I really like, but he ain't exactly Randy Moss. We have to do better! We can't afford to only build via Free agency.
×
×
  • Create New...