Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ghosts.....


Zod

Recommended Posts

How many cell phone video cameras are out there now? Hundreds of millions? Yet not one authentic ghost video. Odd.

Zod is right nothing supernatural outside of human capacity exists on earth, however very rarely humans have supernatural tendencies.

Aliens however probably do exist. They would appear nothing like a human form and are most likely something similar to bacteria, but with how infinite the universe is the chance of life outside earth is actually pretty good

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Vampires aren't real either tho...

Cannibals, sure... but not vampires...

Witches are real! And, I have felt the breath of evil! (Both real and imagined.)

I have also seen the aftermath of man's inhumanity man. (Which has nothing to do with spirits.) Which is a form of self-made evil in itself!

If your Catholic, you must believe in spirits, why else would there be exorcisms?

I believe we have a Guardian Angel, but don't always listen to their advice.

Hamlet:

Swear by my sword

Never to speak of this that you have heard.

Ghost:

[
Beneath
] Swear by his sword.

Hamlet:

Well said, old mole, canst work i' th' earth so fast?

A worthy pioner! Once more remove, good friends.

Horatio:

O day and night, but this is wondrous strange!

Hamlet:

And therefore as a stranger give it welcome.

There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio,

Than are dreamt of in your philosophy.

Scrooge to Marley's ghost: "There's more of gravy than of the grave about you, whatever you are!"

Ghosts & Demons have been written about for hundreds of years!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The believer will tell you spirits are more visible to us at sleepytime because our mind is not as cluttered by the mundane, and therfore more "receptive".

Someone with an ounce of reason would argue the above mentioned altered state is the exact reason for misinterpreting stimuli.

As is the dark.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...