Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

what is worse?...not football related

carolinarolls

By carolinarolls,
in Huddle Lounge

Recommended Posts

carolinarolls Newbie

carolinarolls

Posted
Posted

My wife is the youngest of three girls in her family. Apparently there is a notorious "Black Kitty Cat" costume made by her mother that all three girls wore for Halloween when they were 2-3 years old and this year the middle sister wants to have her 2 yr. old son wear it. Hearing this the other day I had to speak up even though I rarely get in the mother daughter discussions but come on.... Boys don't wear "Kitty Cat" costumes. Please.

So I get a call from the middle sister the other day who had apparently heard about my comments and after getting over her initial reaction of offense talked about the situation with some coworkers of hers and came up with a solution.

Since I am the Panther fan in the family she just new I would be thrilled to hear that the "Black Kitty Cat" costume is now a "Panther" costume augmented by a youth jersey and spiced up in the likeness of Sir Purr.

[facepalm]

Damnit. I honestly think that's somehow WORSE!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
charlotte49er Newbie

charlotte49er

Posted
Posted

In-laws: who gives a poo?

Unless she's moderately good looking and there's a chance that you might get to nail her in the future! Never burn a bridge my friend!

Sisters that get along, are more likely to have a 3-Way (or in the case of 3 Sisters, a 4-Way?) The only thing more likely for a 3-Way is a girl/woman who is Bi! (Which is a good majority of the women who work at Gentlemen's Clubs.)

Keep the peace. It may not pay out now, but you never know what the furture holds.

The Wise Sage!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      Mason Graham Bandwagon

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      When we drafted Luke, we already had Cam, Smith, Olsen, Stewart, Deangleo, Gross, Kalil, CJ, Hardy, Beason, TD, Gamble (and maybe more I'm forgetting), we had a lot of great pieces in place. Going pure BPA for a player with Luke's potential when the LB you already have is different when you already have all those pieces in place.  Our OL right now is probably in a better shape than that team and our RBs and TE have potential compared to proven vets back then, but after that, the 2012 roster was in a far better shape than we are right now. We need a #1 WR, DEs, LBs, DBs, C, and depending who you ask a QB.  Going BPA at pick #5 when that player is a DT and your current best player on either side of the ball is a DT, seems irresponsible. If he's the only player they like that high left, then you trade back and go with position of more need at a slot that makes sense for the player while adding other picks.  If you trade back and he falls because other teams don't need/want a DT, then you consider him at that point because of the value.    
    • Carolina Mike
      Mason Graham Bandwagon

      By Carolina Mike · Posted

      This sounds like the same back and forth when we drafted a LB when we already had a LB or as mentioned prior back to back DLs. I want the BPA, if it is another DT so be it. (No not a kicker/punter for those people that think they are funny))
    • Carolina Mike
      2024 College Football Thread

      By Carolina Mike · Posted

      I’m hoping SMU messes it all up and wins out. Imagine the SEC & BI0 would crap themselves trying to “fix” the problem.
×
×
  • Create New...