Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Who do you blame


Doc Holiday

Recommended Posts

Ok, I know there are some threads similar to this but here it is.

Who do you blame for this season? Fox or Jerry?

Before you say Fox considering how long he held onto Jake do you think he was all for this youth movement? By releasing and trading players like Harris and Hoover. Do you think that he didn't want to go after any FA WR's like boldin? I'd say no I'll also say that it wasn't his decision to draft Edwards.

Basically a lot of the issues with the panthers this season you could argue as not being Fox's fault.

So my question is do you still blame Fox or do you blame Jerry, I know it's easier to hate on a coach then owner because you can fire a coach and you can't fire the owner. But honestly IMHO Jerry is much more to blame here then Fox.

And with that said would you want Fox back with that in mind or do you want him gone anyway?

I'm honestly split on this..... Manly because I would like to see someone get a little more creative on offense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

100% Richardson. Fox has been mediocre for a while. Richardson should have made changes well before this year. Combine keeping Fox/Davidson around, with his cheapness this season, getting rid of vets we could have used, and it's totally him. I also think he should have brought in a new coach this year, cause obviously Fox is gone and he knows it and has given up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we have more talent than the 09 team did but the experience is not there. We should have kept Hoover. Harris should have stayed but I don't think his play would be better than Godfrey or Martin's. He's just a very smart player and a great leader. I think he could have been an interesting joker/LB prospect in this defense but he wasn't as good as he was. We should have signed a vet QB to help out Moore and Clausen.

Moreso I blame Richardson but this team is capable of winning and I blame Fox for the offensive struggles. These are not issues that have just come about this season. We have all seen the same problems in this offense for years. Go look at all the bad Fox years, the offensive problems are pretty similar.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There all to blame. JR for being a cheapskate (this year). Fox/Davidson for being Arcadic and showing an inability to adjust a gameplan mid-game (or hell game to game). Hurney for drafting so crappy this year at the top of the draft and at least not getting a couple of low level DT and WR FA (I doubt JR wouldn't let him sign anyone).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

100% Richardson. Fox has been mediocre for a while. Richardson should have made changes well before this year. Combine keeping Fox/Davidson around, with his cheapness this season, getting rid of vets we could have used, and it's totally him. I also think he should have brought in a new coach this year, cause obviously Fox is gone and he knows it and has given up.

There is not a single vet player released that would make this team any better right now.

Don't say Hoover....he was injured and beaten up. That is why no one has even considered signing him.

Moose....maybe would add a little help at WR, but his skills were diminishing.

Defense...we are playing OK.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • some of my favorite mocks i do are trading back with Indy or Miami, but not Arizona, as that lets Hotlanta pick before us.
    • Carter, Graham, and Hunter for me. Other than that I'm listening to offers. Hell, I'm listening to offers anyway. I'm not doing the Gettleman thing of submitting the pick immediately. If the phones are ringing there's no cost to listening. Maybe someone has an offer so good that I can't refuse.
    • These numbers do not measure a player's prime. Do these numbers include OL pulled up from the practice squad for a game or two then cut?  Do they include players who might have been injured or cut for reasons other than they were past their primes?  The average career for an NFL lineman is 3.63 years, and that is because there is a lot of turnover--regardless of a player's prime. In fact, if only 55% of Offensive linemen drafted in the first round succeed, then the failure rates of most offensive linemen drafted and undrafted would be much lower, cause them to skew the average age of the OL.  This suggests that most players' retirement from the NFL is not based on their prime, but other factors.  They are cut, released, injured--and that is based on their level of play compared to others, not their levels of play within their personal skill range--something that peaks during your prime. In this case, I was talking about Moton, an elite offensive tackle, one that avoided the factors that shorten careers unrelated to their primes. I identify Moton as the team's best offensive lineman on an impressive OL--that distinguishes the type of player being referenced, so I did not provide a lot of qualifiers--as you didn't with your stats.   In this article below, one that evaluates established Offensive tackles, it states the following, which supports my comment:  "Most elite offensive tackles start to decline at roughly the age of 32 if they haven’t already."  So to say that Moton was at the end of his prime was not a reach or careless speculation.  If a player has the skill to be competitive and they can avoid injuries, their career expectancy is much higher than an average of all offensive lineman on a fluid roster. https://www.milehighreport.com/2017/2/27/14724674/age-wall-for-offensive-tackles-nfl  
×
×
  • Create New...