Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Potential Head Coaches

Mr. Scot

By Mr. Scot,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Swarly Newbie

Swarly

Posted
Posted

I'd be alright with bringing in McDaniels as long as he had no control of the team. Dude is awesome with quarterbacks, and still has a great offensive mind. His downfall is he tries to be like Belichick with his crazy trades/etc and it just doesn't work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Swarly Newbie

Swarly

Posted
Posted

No thanks, he's an idiot as demonstrated in Denver.

he's an idiot when he has control of personnel decisions. when he's just running the offense and teaching the players he's one of the best in the game. guy just can't handle the business aspect of football.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bj-monster56 Newbie

Bj-monster56

Posted
Posted

I think what mcdaniels problem was, was that he tried to be somebody he is not. Thats the worst thing you can ever do. He tried to be Bill by making all the trades an just do all the little things that he do.He was a good offensive coordinator i have to give it to him, but by the stuff he did in Denver may hurt his head coaching career. Well to be honest it already did. I have no problem with him coming to Carolina to be an coordinator an to help Jimmy Clausen or Andrew Luck or who ever it may be out. But the stuff that he did in denver he needs to let that stay in Denver.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • LinvilleGorge
      2024 College Football Thread

      By LinvilleGorge · Posted

      Well, we got our answer on Army today.
×
×
  • Create New...