Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If you're going to bench Clausen, start Armanti


frash.exe

Recommended Posts

My first choice to start would still be Clausen, I think he needs a continuous string of starts if he's going to make some progress.

attachment.php?attachmentid=33552&stc=1&d=1286916620

Other than him though, Edwards has a style all his own on this team and might provide the offense with a bit of spark playing QB, given his mobility. He might be able to roll out and keep defenses from just attacking the pocket. If he ends up throwing 7/20 for 40 yards, i mean, it's not like we haven't seen that before.

attachment.php?attachmentid=33554&stc=1&d=1286916806

I guess you could go with Lurch but if we bench Jimmy it should be because we're trying to change the offensive approach completely, and Edwards is the only one that really provides that.

attachment.php?attachmentid=33555&stc=1&d=1286916943

In lieu of starting Jimmy, Armanti, and Tony, why would you go with Wembley? He's a f**king fraggle, defenses won't know what the hell he's doing on the field, and that might distract them long enough for him to run a play and find the endzone.

attachment.php?attachmentid=33556&stc=1&d=1286917193

Of course if you're a neurotic conservative nail-biting fiend who's deathly afraid of trying anything different you go with Moore so he can miss wide open receivers 10 yards away and lose field position faster than the Twins lost the ALDS, but then again, that would've defeated the whole purpose of starting Jimmy in the first place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

agreed, moore should be last choice. we know what we have there, lets try the others first and see what shakes out.

i still might put lurch in there ahead of edwards. not sure why. it might be because he might know the offense but then there isn't that much to know about it that all the other teams don't know.

i guess edwards would be alright. i just don't see davidson being creative enough or fox being wild enough to just let edwards do his thing unless there's only a couple games to go and we're screwed either way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

agreed, moore should be last choice. we know what we have there, lets try the others first and see what shakes out.

i still might put lurch in there ahead of edwards. not sure why. it might be because he might know the offense but then there isn't that much to know about it that all the other teams don't know.

i guess edwards would be alright. i just don't see davidson being creative enough or fox being wild enough to just let edwards do his thing unless there's only a couple games to go and we're screwed either way.

Thank GOD, you don't make the teams decisions.

Atarting AE before looking at the other QB's is laughable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think starting Armanti would make us look even more like a joke. I'm not saying he shouldn't see a few snaps just to see how we could potentially use him. However he's been training all this time to be a WR. There's no way he'd be ready to start. Giving up on Clausen and Moore completely for our 3rd round WR would make us look like complete fools.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think starting Armanti would make us look even more like a joke. I'm not saying he shouldn't see a few snaps just to see how we could potentially use him. However he's been training all this time to be a WR. There's no way he'd be ready to start. Giving up on Clausen and Moore completely for our 3rd round WR would make us look like complete fools.

Wait!! You mean those four years at App State he was really a receiver?!?

Whoa! And they said he was a QB!

Always lies everywhere!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank GOD, you don't make the teams decisions.

Atarting AE before looking at the other QB's is laughable.

i don't want to Atart edwards before looking at the other QBs. i want to start him big difference (i assume).

we know what moore can do. lets see what the other prospects can do. the season is a wash anyways. lets see what works and if it doesn't then we go with another untested one.

we've already looked at moore, right? not impressed with his being "the man" enough to give him the job back.

go start another thread about it, though. you know you want to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You start Clausen the rest of the year no if's and buts about it. You made the choice to go to him on week 3, now you gotta follow throw. A carousel at QB is not going to improve anyone, and your still not gonna know what you got at QB.

Clausen needs to start the rest of the season, and you hope that by the last few weeks of the season he starts showing his true potential.

As unfair as it was to Moore, 3 starts doesn't make a career, and you have to let the kid take his lumps and grow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You start Clausen the rest of the year no if's and buts about it. You made the choice to go to him on week 3, now you gotta follow throw. A carousel at QB is not going to improve anyone, and your still not gonna know what you got at QB.

Clausen needs to start the rest of the season, and you hope that by the last few weeks of the season he starts showing his true potential.

As unfair as it was to Moore, 3 starts doesn't make a career, and you have to let the kid take his lumps and grow.

Obviously you didn't see that the Panthers have Wembley the Fraggle on the roster. Jimmy Clausen is a waste of my time as a fan, if a Fraggle is on the roster.

Get that little bastard on the field!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • From the article: Starting last Thursday, the talk started to intensify of Johnson to the Raiders. Coincidentally, or not, that was the same day the Raiders fired G.M. Tom Telesco, clearing a path for the “alignment” that Johnson has prioritized with the front office. Not that Johnson would ask for Telesco or anyone else to be fired. If a team really wants Johnson, however, it needs to hear the clues and act accordingly. If the Raiders, as it seems, want Johnson, they have acted accordingly. Johnson, we’ve heard, emerged from his Raiders interview with positive feelings about the team and minority owner Tom Brady — who has taken a major role in the ongoing search for a new coach. ... Most recently, we’ve caught wind of a rumor that the Raiders have made a “massive” contract offer to Johnson. While it’s premature for offers to officially be made, given that they’ve yet to conduct a face-to-face interview with Johnson, the talk is out there that a big number is unofficially out there. Whether it’s credible or not remains to be seen. Owner Mark Davis isn’t exactly in the upper echelon of cash-rich NFL owners. With recent buyouts to the likes of Jon Gruden, Josh McDaniels, Dave Ziegler, Antonio Pierce, and Telesco, piggy banks might need to be busted open to blow the entry-level curve on Johnson. A “massive” deal also would ruffle feathers among the other owners, some of whom are obsessed with staving off a bidding wars for coaches, where there’s no salary cap and no franchise tag and the market could easily go haywire. ... But it’s more than money for Johnson. If he works for the Raiders, he has access to Brady. Regardless of the niceties of the rules, there’s also talk that they’ve spent plenty of time talking on the phone. They’re allowed to converse within the confines of Brady’s job with Fox. Although he can’t attend production meetings, Brady is allowed to talk to coaches and players about the games he’ll be working. And he’ll be working the Lions game this weekend. ... There’s currently no other destination that fits. Johnson has interviewed with the Raiders, Bears, Jaguars, and Patriots. The alignment he wants doesn’t exist in Jacksonville, and likely isn’t in play with the Bears. Unless the Cowboys (who blew their window to interview Johnson at any time before the Lions’ season ends because they didn’t interview him via Zoom last week) make a late run, it’s the Raiders or the status quo for Johnson. More and more people in league circles believe it will be the Raiders
    • I’m a Bryce fan, and he can definitely make throws with guys in his face. But watching taller guys play, you see times when they are completely surrounded and the OL is in their lap and they can see and throw over that. Bryce can’t make that play but it seems like he is moving out of the pocket before that happens which is what he should do.
    • Lots of chatter on this topic... Also lots of effort to paste this link. (took about ten tries) 😖  
×
×
  • Create New...