Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

An unbiased look at Clausen


jpo287

Recommended Posts

I agree. Clausen has so much time in the pocket more times than not. Our Oline is great. Yep. Great.

Actually their analysis which was formed by watched game film play by play actually says he did have time most of the game. They report that on 17 of his 21 throws not including the 3 sacks, he was not under pressure when he threw.

Part of that I suspect includes that if he scrambles to avoid pressure like he did on the throw to Stewart and no one was close to him when he actually threw the ball, that he wasn't pressured on the throw. The analysis was on his accuracy or lack thereof.

Plus he only mentioned Schwartz in his one on one matchup not the whole line.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you don't see what? A rookie struggling w/ the NFL QB position (game speed)? You don't see a kid more focused on not hurting the team than looking to make plays?

Bradford is currently significantly ahead of Clausen. Watch an entire Rams game.....he is imo is the best looking rookie in years thus far. Can't recall a rookie who looked this good in his first 4 NFL starts....not talking just stats or wins.

I didn't mean to turn this into a Clausen Bradford debate except to say that Bradford got the prep that Clausen should have gotten had there been serious plans to start him this early in the season.

Bradford does look pretty good so far. But he is definitely a game manager at this point working out routes and timing. Clausen's not as grounded as Bradford but I would take Clausen's 4th down conversion late in the game last week over anything Bradford has done all season. Clausen shows me flashes of a quarterback that can be clutch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't mean to turn this into a Clausen Bradford debate except to say that Bradford got the prep that Clausen should have gotten had there been serious plans to start him this early in the season.

Bradford does look pretty good so far. But he is definitely a game manager at this point working out routes and timing. Clausen's not as grounded as Bradford but I would take Clausen's 4th down conversion late in the game last week over anything Bradford has done all season. Clausen shows me flashes of a quarterback that can be clutch.

I wouldn't.

to me that play was like LaFell one handed catch.....I would be more impressed w/ him looking better on the plays he should be doing better on than a wild fluke play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not unusual for a rookie to have trouble adjusting to the pro play clock.

And as mentioned elsewhere, I'd rather have him taking sacks than "panic throwing", something a lot of young guys do while trying to adjust to the speed of the NFL pass rush.

He's progressing. I don't expect him to look elite by year's end, mind you. Improvement is all I care about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So what are the positives in Clausen.

So far manages the ball well with few turnovers

Scans the field OK but could improve

Decent mobility

What else?

well he is only scanning the field when plays breakdown and he moves out of the pocket. Otherwise it is his first read 99% of the time.

but I will do my positives. Overall, I think Jimmy has the ability to throw some of the best short to mid range balls we have seen in Carolina....once he calms down some more. He isn't comfortable enough imo to play to his strengths yet....that should come soon.

he is good in the pocket in sensing trouble......better than anyone we have seen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not unusual for a rookie to have trouble adjusting to the pro play clock.

And as mentioned elsewhere, I'd rather have him taking sacks than "panic throwing", something a lot of young guys do while trying to adjust to the speed of the NFL pass rush.

He's progressing. I don't expect him to look elite by year's end, mind you. Improvement is all I care about.

This is why I don't take a lot of what the Clausen haters here have to say seriously.

Jimmy has played smart football, and they're using it as an excuse to bash him.

Watching him take the sack over doing somethin stupid, taking the check-down over forcing it into coverage for an INT (you know, like that other guy on the roster kept doing..)

All smart play from our rookie QB.

I'm impressed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest DrewBreesIsGod

you guys should bring in his brother Rick Clausen. Dude could throw a 5 yarder in the flat with the best of them. Problem is, that is as far as he could throw it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is why I don't take a lot of what the Clausen haters here have to say seriously.

Jimmy has played smart football, and they're using it as an excuse to bash him.

Watching him take the sack over doing somethin stupid, taking the check-down over forcing it into coverage for an INT (you know, like that other guy on the roster kept doing..)

All smart play from our rookie QB.

I'm impressed.

it isn't hate.

Jimmy just isn't ready to be on the field yet. I wouldn't call it "smart" football. You can tell he isn't comfortable w/ the speed yet....and it is causing him to be conservative. He goes to his first read on a quick throw or scramble as the first sign of pressure. That leaves a lot of "smart" plays on the field not to be made.

I like what I have seen thus far from Jimmy. People are just trying to overblow stuff and pretend he is currently something he isn't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is why I don't take a lot of what the Clausen haters here have to say seriously.

Jimmy has played smart football, and they're using it as an excuse to bash him.

Watching him take the sack over doing somethin stupid, taking the check-down over forcing it into coverage for an INT (you know, like that other guy on the roster kept doing..)

All smart play from our rookie QB.

I'm impressed.

Clausen's been very good at distributing the ball as well.

Two things lacking at this point:

He really needs to either adjust his release point to get some air under his passes (not likely) or learn to look for a throwing lane (more likely). Otherwise he'll continue to see a lot of knockdowns, and maybe picks, with those low trajectory passes.

The other? While I'm happy that he knows how to check down, the Panther offense as currently designed lives and dies on the big play. Clausen hasn't been able to execute much in that regard yet. Until that changes, our running game is going to continue to be stuffed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...