Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

An unbiased look at Clausen


jpo287

Recommended Posts

p55, what you just said is entirely why I think at least part of why Clausen doesn't seem NFL ready falls on the coaches, and what I was getting at before.

edit: who is saying the rookie WRs aren't rookie WRs? Confused by above post. When Goodson's in the game, it's kinda frightening how little experience the offense has, haha.

Not sure if Jimmy would know what to do anyway but at least he would have a chance to shoe it or not.

As for Rookie receivers here is all we need to do. Put Rosario in as the TE and split Barnidge out wide. Put Goodson in the slot. Put Gettis on the other side. Rotate Barnidge and LaFell given neither get enough time to be able to run all day. Then you are actually playing 1 rookie some of the time not all the a time. Then swing the back out of the backfield sometimes as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ahaha, has anyone seen the tags for this thread? just noticed them.

anyway, p55, I think you have the right idea and I wouldn't be surprised by that kind of formation. I would also not be surprised to see a lot of Clowney, even though he doesn't know the system well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

rome wasnt built in a day People. You cant expect him to freakin come right out of College and play like a Pro. I mean he played some GOOD college ball. But this is the big leagues. Give homeboy some time. He just needs time. Let him have it. I mean obviously he is getting better but just think about it this way..... in like 2 years when we are the ish, you can look back and say, "Wow. I remember when that kid was a rookie and wasnt that good". see. all better now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...