Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I don't think losing Smith for a week or three is that bad a thing.


Fiz

Recommended Posts

In the short term, it will hurt the team and it may also prevent Clausen from gaining chemistry with Smith he definitely needs for the future. In the long term, it will get valuable playing time to players who can only benefit from it for next season.

More than our receivers, we need better o-line play - I think we have someone who can get our guys the ball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Steve Smith is my favorite player.

I'm wearing his jersey as we speak, and I wore it proudly today at the Superdome.

But.

Clausen to Gettis has to become an established threat if we ever want Smitty to be a vital part of our offense again.

If not, coverages are continue to roll to Steve's side of the field, making it impossible to get him in the game.

I think losing him for a week is a blessing in disguise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

WTF!! Steve Smith is the offense!! Teams have to account for him if not they stack the box and kill us!! We need Smitty back asap!!

I agree. Clausen will have a lot of trouble even trying to get it to Gettis and all the other slower receivers we have held onto. Also Smitty can block like a mofo, it'll hurt our run game as well. I can see either side's point. Smith just isn't part of the future of this team. They have got to find a receiver.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'd give it a C mainly because of Brooks.  If we just didn't have a 2nd I'd argue B to B+ tbh. Brooks was a bad gamble, tho one that could still pay off long term. Yes XL only has 400 yards but... Look who is throwing him the ball. And I think he isn't a "true #1" but he's been able to consistently get open. Hands definitely need to be cleaned up.  But he should end the year with 500-600 yards. Like you said - Sanders looks great.  Get him a better QB / more time with a QB and I think he's gonna impress. We added a couple rotational players on D that have both made plays and show promise for the future from later rounds. So I'd say, Brooks really hurts this drafts grade. It'll be interesting to see how it progresses over the next 3 years. I've overall really liked Morgan's FA acquisitions, so...
    • Oh he would absolutely flourish. It’s the panthers way. It’s no different with coaches. Sometimes they reach their expiration date, go somewhere else, and find new success.  Similarly to Burns, how long to wait for the light to finally turn on?  Market forces will demand a salary that the panthers can not responsibly match. Sliding him to guard will fit his skill set better, but he has played LT for 3 years. He will receive offers from other teams wanting to pay him LT money.  At guard, he won’t start with what they have paid Hunt and Lewis. Center then?? Dunno. Maybe? He will become a backup by default once they draft their stud LT. I doubt Dan just stands pat. That’s not his MO.  So where does this put him? Can you match what other teams will offer for a backup LT/guard? Do you dish out franchise LT $ on a guy who still needs significant improvement in pass protection. This team will be DOA in the playoffs with the very first team who has a formidable speed rusher. What if he has hit his ceiling in pass protection already and they sign him long term? It’s a big gamble either way. 
    • We're in a great position to see just how big of a misstep it would be, having made so many ourselves
×
×
  • Create New...