Ownership

[Catdaddy]

Ownership is our problem. Fox has his hands tied and has no say. But Fox won't let our team quit, and don't be shocked if he gets a contract extension!

[realdeal]

He will if not jake would have been with us this year. They make their mind up that fox was going to take this team forward. But with a new QB. You don't rebuild with a coach that you going to let go. The new coach my want to go in a different direction. But I think letting Peppers go was the biggest mistake we made this year. If you going to let him go at least take the money and make sure you keep your key guy like williams. But they may feel why not let him play his last year out incase he gets hurt or something because we took a big hit in the pocket with Jake. We can alway put the tag on him next year if we have to.

The only way I can see to sign him, would be to have trade value for him. Because if I where to trade anyone it would be him or King. Because we are going to have to get someone that can take king shot that can catch the ball and run down field. Which King can't do.

In our offence that we only have one or two WR running down field at a time, our TE will have to be a down field threat. And down field I mean get more then a first down, run after the catch. To be a come from behind team. It would be nice to aways be in the front but this is the NFL.

[Catdaddy]

He will if not jake would have been with us this year. They make their mind up that fox was going to take this team forward. But with a new QB. You don't rebuild with a coach that you going to let go. The new coach my want to go in a different direction. But I think letting Peppers go was the biggest mistake we made this year. If you going to let him go at least take the money and make sure you keep your key guy like williams. But they may feel why not let him play his last year out incase he gets hurt or something because we took a big hit in the pocket with Jake. We can alway put the tag on him next year if we have to.

The only way I can see to sign him, would be to have trade value for him. Because if I where to trade anyone it would be him or King. Because we are going to have to get someone that can take king shot that can catch the ball and run down field. Which King can't do.

In our offence that we only have one or two WR running down field at a time, our TE will have to be a down field threat. And down field I mean get more then a first down, run after the catch. To be a come from behind team. It would be nice to aways be in the front but this is the NFL.

WTF are you saying?

[Zaximus]

WTF are you saying?

Ignore this poster, no one EVER knows what he's saying. He's like the guy on Napoleon Dynamite that no one can understand at the chicken egg farm.

[Lumps]

He's foreign.

I don't understand, something about tying up Fox and an extension?

[PhillyB]

stop making threads

[Squirrel]

stop making threads

This.

[GRWatcher]

Ownership is our problem. Fox has his hands tied and has no say. But Fox won't let our team quit, and don't be shocked if he gets a contract extension!

I agree with this except I don't think there's any contract extension coming.

[Dpantherman]

Didn't you make this thread yesterday?

[Mother Grabber]

I'll support Squirrel if he locks this thread.

[rayzor]

I'll support Squirrel if he locks every catdaddy thread.

x2