Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Earth-like planet discovered


hepcat

Recommended Posts

We don't actually know that. Human knowledge, even though it has expanded a lot over the last few hundred years, is still extremely limited. We believe there are limits on ftl travel, but that doesn't mean there isn't a way around that restriction.

Thats because we are stuck on a old compulsion and propulsion systems. Once we get people thinking away from them we will succeed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

nah, the whole world would have incested itself out.

That would have phased out. But my point being the Fall of Rome was in 496 but started earlier than that. The Renaissance Age the earliest it started was 14th century. That is a 1300 year gap in European development. So we are 1300 years behind where we should be. Just my opinion I know the Asian countries didnt have this setback but if the Europeans hadnt the Asian countries would be different today too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That would have phased out. But my point being the Fall of Rome was in 496 but started earlier than that. The Renaissance Age the earliest it started was 14th century. That is a 1300 year gap in European development. So we are 1300 years behind where we should be. Just my opinion I know the Asian countries didnt have this setback but if the Europeans hadnt the Asian countries would be different today too.

I mean do you think we would have had the "Enlightenment" 1500 years sooner if Rome didn't fall? Industrial Revolution? Maybe. Rome was closer than anything that came after it. We didn't have a scientific method to discover and prove theories before that. But there is no evidence to suggest that Rome was even on the path to anything along those lines.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I mean do you think we would have had the "Enlightenment" 1500 years sooner if Rome didn't fall? Industrial Revolution? Maybe. Rome was closer than anything that came after it. We didn't have a scientific method to discover and prove theories before that. But there is no evidence to suggest that Rome was even on the path to anything along those lines.

it's kinda difficult to say because Rome didn't really fall from external problems.

Rome wasn't on the track toward the renaissance because it was failing from the inside. The system was faulted, it couldn't succeed. If Rome wasn't Rome it might have made it to the Renaissance. But I understand what Squirrel is saying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...