Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

3-4 versus 4-3


Tutto

Recommended Posts

http://www.carolinahuddle.com/forum/44432-time-to-interview-cowher-7.html

Here is the thread where a 3-4 vs 4-3 comparision is brought up using the Pittsburgh Steelers of 2007.

Why Do Beason & Davis not fit the 3-4 scheme ?

Beason 6'0 237 Timmons 6'1" 234

Connor 6'2" 231 Farrior 6'2" 243

Davis 6' 0" 240 Harrison 6'0" 242

Size wise they look awful close to 3 0f the Steelers starting LB's

Hardy 6'4" 277

Noorwood 6'1" 241 Woodley 6'2" 265

The problem is a true NT and DE

One would almost think drafting Hardy & Norwood was for a 3-4 defense in the future

Obviously the problem is the starting DL on the current Panthers team.. Where would you get them?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.carolinahuddle.com/forum/44432-time-to-interview-cowher-7.html

Here is the thread where a 3-4 vs 4-3 comparision is brought up using the Pittsburgh Steelers of 2007.

Obviously the problem is the starting DL on the current Panthers team.. Where would you get them?

when comparing you can't just look at size cause our lb's are decent, it's that you would reduce their greatest asset(speed). teams draft players that fit what they do,doesn't mean our guys couldn't though. it is also important to remember that many teams run the 34 but only a few are as agressive as most of us would like to see

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...