Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

OchoCinco Sex Line


boo7382

Recommended Posts

hahahahahaha

Talk about a wrong number.

What was intended as effort endorsed by Cincinnati Bengals wide receiver Chad Ochocinco to raise money for a children's charity instead directs consumers to a phone sex line, the Cincinnati Enquirer reported Thursday.

Boxes of Chad Ochocinco Cereal, a limited edition offering featuring the Bengals star's likeness, include a phone number printed on them, 1-800-HELP-FTC, that connects callers to a seductive-sounding message that asks for a debit or credit card and states: "You must be 18 or older to get into this party, baby!" instead of the charity Feed The Children.

According to the Enquirer, the correct number to donate to the charity is 1-888-HELP-FTC.

The low fat, honey nut, toasted oat cereal -- available for $5 per box -- went on sale earlier this month at Cincinnati area grocery stores.

Ochocinco could not be reached early Thursday for comment. He told WCPO-TV Channel 9 on Wednesday the number was clearly a mistake for which he was not responsible. He said he is confident the Pittsburgh company behind the cereal, PBL Sports, will fix the problem.

PBL Sports also could not be reached for comment.

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/09000d5d81af3f9e/article/wrong-number-ochocinco-cereal-box-includes-sex-line-number

Link to comment
Share on other sites

hahahahahaha

Talk about a wrong number.

What was intended as effort endorsed by Cincinnati Bengals wide receiver Chad Ochocinco to raise money for a children's charity instead directs consumers to a phone sex line, the Cincinnati Enquirer reported Thursday.

Well, is it worth calling?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • I'm not religious. I don't care that he is. It has no impact on whether or not he will succeed as a head coach in the NFL. If he doesn't work out here so be it. I'm not wasting keystrokes going off on tangents about his personal life. If I were that deeply invested to that point I wouldn't even be following sports at all. Clearly for whatever reason you do as the previous threads you have created eviscerating Dave Canales over that and his personal life would clearly indicate. But that's your prerogative.
    • The approach we took to build the WR room is one I will always be miffed by. I’ve never liked our draft choices and it always leaves me feeling uneasy (even back to LaFell/Gettis/Armanti). I loved Pearsall and Ladd, but those just aren’t types we target for some reason. RB wise - Just seeing what Bucky Irving has done this year with guys Canales’ built his offense around last year, is enough to really make the RB approach seem questionable.  If we were unsure about Chuba preseason, then we should’ve gotten a guy who could’ve played immediately. If we were confident in Chuba, then we should’ve targeted a Ray Davis, Irving, Tracy, Guerendo etc a bit later and reserve the R2 capital for a potential long term starter.  The reasoning doesn’t entirely check out even though I love Brooks as a prospect.  I dunno, just still feels off. Same taste I got with the Horn pick. Same with bringing back Hurney. Just a big old ick.
    • I don't have anything against this kid, but personally I would not draft yet another big physical WR.  Besides, this point is moot after Ashton Jeanty cut this promo after the Mountain West Championship.  If Dan saw this, the pick is already in.  
×
×
  • Create New...