Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Seriously Steve Young?


Montsta

Recommended Posts

Why was he hating on us so much after the game? Talking about how we think we are a good team but they need more passing? Is that just the inherit QBness talking? If you run at will for 7+ YPC and for 300 yards, why on Earth would you throw the ball? Ask Peyton Manning if he would like to have a 300 yard running back tandem. Or Tom brady or anyone else. As a lifetime SF Bay Area resident, I've always had respect for Steve Young, but I wanted to bitch smack him after tonight. Anyone else get irked by this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I actually agree with Young's assessment and think it was moronic for Stu Scott to argue with him. Of course you need a consistent passing offense to go along with a running game; we can't run it at will every single game so we're gonna need solid play from Jake.

If we want to be a contender in the playoffs we need better, more consistent play from Jake to go along with our run game. If we become one-dimensional teams will eventually catch up to that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

and why should we care what steve young or any lame brain pundit says?

I agree with you about not listening to experts or pundits Dellinger, I usually laugh them off, I just think it was funny how much he didn't credit us for what we did. And that pick that landed in Phillips lap was just laughable. We still had a 100+ yard receiver, and Moose played very well also.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am not sure but it looked like Stew and he weren't on the same page on that second one. They were both great plays by the defense I thought rather than hideous throws/decisions. The decision of his I thought was bad was taking that sack instead of throwing it away in the RZ. He DOES need to throw it away more often, that I grant you. I also wonder about the tipped balls. They said during the game that he has had a ton this year. Since he never had an inordinate amount before I wonder if the tweak in his mechanics due to his elbow is causing an issue there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mr. MVP himself( Drew Brees), threw 3 INT's against the Bucs, so it's not like they are an easy team to throw on or anything.

Anyway, the Panthers threw the ball enough to loosen up the defense for the running game so what's the big deal? I really don't get why people are all over Delhomme after this one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mr. MVP himself( Drew Brees), threw 3 INT's against the Bucs, so it's not like they are an easy team to throw on or anything.

Anyway, the Panthers threw the ball enough to loosen up the defense for the running game so what's the big deal? I really don't get why people are all over Delhomme after this one.

That is the point I was trying to make Monstercat. You hit the nail on the head. I know Jake can be inconsistent at times, but give me a break. Pundits crack me up. Two 400 yardgames and they are talking trade Brady and keep Cassell, and look at him now. Don't jump on anyone too quickly Steve, Jake orchestrates the game pretty well, and plays better in the clutch than most I think.

Case in point, on the Smitty TD throw, I was shouting at the screen that the RB was WIDE open for a moderate gain on the screen, and he had vision enough to go deep to Smitty. Anyone see that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i didn't see it as hate. i saw it as true constructive criticism for some things that we need to improve on. i saw him as someone who respected what we did tonight and said somethings that if we do manage to put into practice, things that will honestly make us better, then we will go all the way.

he was giving us the recipe for further success.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My sister called me from Boston (Panthers fan) just to tell me about his comments...seriously....how many concusions has he had!?!?!

He just said Peppers could play quarterback if he wanted, he's that much of an athlete :eek:

Steve Young did just say..."that was the most dominating drive, 3 plays 90 yards, I've ever seen in the pros."

But saying, "I don't like all the pumpfakes, that won't be a completion in January." talking about the TD to Smitty...THAT PLAY WAS SICK! IDK What the hell he's talking about..."Running in quick sand"?

Oh...those GMEN were really "clicking" on all cylinders Sunday...whatever...let him talk...but he did say if we bring it ALL together we will make a Super Bowl run.

...and they're giving us some "Smash and Dash" credit ;-)

Man, I love watching Sportscenter when they ACTUALLY talk about the Panthers (let along revolve the show around us)...this is great!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why was he hating on us so much after the game? Talking about how we think we are a good team but they need more passing? Is that just the inherit QBness talking? If you run at will for 7+ YPC and for 300 yards, why on Earth would you throw the ball? Ask Peyton Manning if he would like to have a 300 yard running back tandem. Or Tom brady or anyone else. As a lifetime SF Bay Area resident, I've always had respect for Steve Young, but I wanted to bitch smack him after tonight. Anyone else get irked by this?

yea well emmitt smith was all about it...go figure haha

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...