Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Fire Trgovac


GSO_Pantherz

Recommended Posts

I'm not smart enough to know how to describe the complexity, I'm repeating what players and other coaches have said about his defenses. Earlier this year, the reporting out of training camp said that he had really simplified things, that his playbook had gotten too complex over the years. They responded by being a top defense in the league for the first eight games. So I'm not being generic there, nor am I making anything up.

I respect Fox. I think he's one of the better coaches in the league. For the money spent and the competition at his level, to have the success he's had over the past seven years is impressive as hell. HE obviously sees something good in Trgovac, even if I can't at times. So, instead of wasting time trying to tell people how awful the guy is and wondering why Fox can't see it (and making up things like "blind loyalty"), I try and figure out what I'm missing. When Trgo took over, we had a veteran defense and they became dominant. Over the years we've gotten younger and suffered for it. To me that suggests that his complex patterns are a bad fit for the current personnel. Maybe you see it different, the only one who's opinion counts though is Fox, and he isn't talking. :)

Our schedule was much softer in the first half of the year, so of course our defense looked better. We're not really all that young relatively speaking (we only had 3 players with less than 5 years experience), so I don't buy the argument that Turdo's brain power is too much for the players to grasp.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our schedule was much softer in the first half of the year, so of course our defense looked better. We're not really all that young relatively speaking (we only had 3 players with less than 5 years experience), so I don't buy the argument that Turdo's brain power is too much for the players to grasp.

First half--four playoff teams, only one opponent that finished with a losing record.

Second half--two playoff teams, three opponents that finished with losnig records.

Can you define soft for me?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First half--four playoff teams, only one opponent that finished with a losing record.

Second half--two playoff teams, three opponents that finished with losnig records.

Can you define soft for me?

At the end of the season our strength of schedule was 20th. Not exactly an intimidating rank. What rank is the cutoff for soft in your eyes?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How is the scheme too complex and what exactly did he do to dumb it down? It's easy to throw out generic sh*t to try and defend the guy, but let's get into specifics.

Here's an article on our defense mid-season, before Fox got back involved with it. It doesn't get into specifics on your questions, but you'll get the idea.

http://www.carolinagrowl.com/Read.aspx?Story=823

But most players agree the turnaround from last year is due in large part to the coaching staff’s decision to simplify the defense.

After plenty of self-evaluation this off-season, the Panthers decided to trim the fat from their defensive playbook. They eliminated a lot of verbiage and a ton of complex plays, which some players say has allowed them to spend less time thinking and more time reacting.

“What happened is that as a defensive staff you put in your core defenses and then you add something and you like it, then you add something and like that, and so on,” Trgovac said. “Pretty soon that list gets to be long. As a coach you look at it and think, ‘Oh they can do that.’

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's a question --- why won't The Oberserver write an article about Trogovac and whether this team can win with him? Especially now with Peppers expressing his dislike with our "system", why can't the media in Charlotte discuss this on a larger scale??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Did we take over a thread about who you'd take #1 by having a debate on who you'd take #1? Basically you still don't want to answer my question, probably because your answer would be either T-Mac like myself, or Hunter, which taking a CB #1 overall is even crazier on the surface than what you're saying I'm stupid for in wanting a WR there. As I've said before, it's a season without a traditional clear top pick(s).  It would be great if we could trade back if we got #1, but if not, there's nothing wrong with taking a truly elite WR and build out our roster correctly for once instead of always trying to find the quick fix and it backfiring. 
    • I just thought of an interesting comparison for what I'm arguing with taking T-Mac and how to build up to hopefully being a contender. The mid 2000's Arizona Cardinals In 2003 they took Anquan Boldin early in the 2nd, kinda a decent comp for Legette with style of play and being more of an elite #2 than a true outside #1 (they also took a WR in the 1st too who didn't pan out). In 2004 they took Larry Fitzgerald #3 overall, the true outside #1. Their QB's at the time, Jeff Blake and Josh McCown The QB they passed on to take Fizgerald, Philip Rivers. They were in the Super Bowl a few years later after they found their QB in Warner to slot into an already built out roster of elite weapons. Cam, you asked how it would look if we passed on a QB who pans out for a WR, well, do you think the Cardinals regret taking Fitz over Rivers?  I highly doubt it. Our roster is more than one offseason away from contending.  I'm not looking for the quick fix because there isn't one with the state of this franchise at the moment, I'm looking to contend for a decade. I don't think a QB in this draft class is good enough to take 1st overall with everything else we still need.  My next preference would be an elite pass rusher, but again, I don't see one of them in this draft either. My personal bias aside, I very honestly think T-Mac is the most can't miss offensive prospect in this draft (Hunter would be that on defense).  He is the WR we've been trying to get since we lost Smitty.   Brooks, T-Mac, Legette, Coker/FA, Sanders would have the potential to be one of the best offensive weapon sets in the NFL.  Sure, hopefully we could hit on a superstar QB in the next draft, but even if not, if those guys pan out, with them all are in their prime together, we wouldn't need a Mahomes or Allen to contend, we'd only need to find our Jared Goff. and spend all our FA money the next couple offseason on Defense.
    • Competent QBs can read defenses presnap, see where their best matchups are and already know where they're going with the ball. Then have good footwork with fast fundamentally sound dropbacks. See the field well and decisive with their decisions on where to go with the ball. And an NFL caliber arm, get the ball out quickly and deliver it with velocity. Bryce can do none of these things.
×
×
  • Create New...