Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rank the 0-3 teams


Newtcase

Recommended Posts

Five 0-3 Teams, ranked in order of opinion.

49ers - Better than their record and us no doubt.

Lions - Very interesting offense, could be 2-1 very easily.

--At this point the teams are performing so poorly that any order is acceptable--

Bills - At least they have Spiller and no expectations.

Browns - In direct competition with us for the most boring team in the NFL.

Panthers - Dead last in points scored of all 0-3 teams with 32, it cannot get worse than it is right now. So cheer up, it can only get better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

why are the 49ers better than us?

they are struggling on offense, defense, and their quarterback play is just as inconsistent as as the Panthers. oh, and their coaching is a lot worse than the Panthers.

I don't see how they are better than their record. they're a below average team, just like the Panthers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

why are the 49ers better than us?

they are struggling on offense, defense, and their quarterback play is just as inconsistent as as the Panthers. oh, and their coaching is a lot worse than the Panthers.

I don't see how they are better than their record. they're a below average team, just like the Panthers.

If you watched the 49ers game vs the Saints you would easily agree that they're a better team than us right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you watched the 49ers game vs the Saints you would easily agree that they're a better team than us right now.

I did see that game, and I saw the 49ers throw away a very winnable game by turning the ball over 4 times(remind you of a certain team?)

They also just got embarrassed by the Chiefs(gave up 3 touchdowns to Matt Cassell and over 200 yards rushing.)

I don't think they're an awful team, I just don't think they are that much, if at all better than the Panthers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I did see that game, and I saw the 49ers throw away a very winnable game by turning the ball over 4 times(remind you of a certain team?)

They also just got embarrassed by the Chiefs(gave up 3 touchdowns to Matt Cassell and over 200 yards rushing.)

I don't think they're an awful team, I just don't think they are that much, if at all better than the Panthers.

Err we got embarrassed by the Bucs.....AND the Giants...

The Chiefs are a solid team, once again if you have seen any of their games you would know they aren't a joke.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Err we got embarrassed by the Bucs.....AND the Giants...

The Chiefs are a solid team, once again if you have seen any of their games you would know they aren't a joke.

yeah I know we did. I never said we were a better team. I just don't think the 49ers are any better. they're not a good football team and that's all that matters(neither are we..)

and I never said the Chiefs are a joke. I think they have a legitimate chance at winning the AFC west, I'm just saying the Panthers aren't the only ones getting embarrassed. Oh, and the 49ers lost pretty badly to the Seahawks too(and I think the Seahawks are a solid team as well.)

just saying, 49ers deserve their 0-3 record just like the Panthers do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I did see that game, and I saw the 49ers throw away a very winnable game by turning the ball over 4 times(remind you of a certain team?)

They also just got embarrassed by the Chiefs(gave up 3 touchdowns to Matt Cassell and over 200 yards rushing.)

I don't think they're an awful team, I just don't think they are that much, if at all better than the Panthers.

Indeed splitting hairs over the better 0-3 teams can be a tedious task. However, the 49ers appear to me to have a better outlook than the Panthers to this point. The Chiefs are also 3-0 for the record and two pretty damn good back with Jones and Charles, anyone who disagrees doesn't know much about football.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • They reached for Pickett, so they are not immune to it.  I could see that as well.  I just think the Colts are flying under the radar and they have been too quiet concerning their QB situation--of course, they could think Jones is their guy (they had a good one named Jones a long time ago) but I think they are done with the Richardson experiment.   Even if I believed in Jones, I would still draft a QB--I also read one mock that said the Jets would take Sanders if he falls to 7---I disagree, but I was once wrong and it still bothers me.
    • I just switched to prime video with fanduel south. Will I be able to watch the Canes playoff games still?
    • I mean, you can use that "logic," but the problem is that most practice squad players, backups or average guys don't put the play on film that Wharton did when given their opportunities.  Perhaps you'll end up right, but I don't think that just because a guy has been in a rotation makes him inherently less productive because he gets more snaps. I will say that the KC fans I've seen on social media loved him, and considered him their second best DT,  regardless of his "rotational" status, and generally considered him a dawg, so I'm going to give him the benefit of doubt until he shows otherwise.
×
×
  • Create New...