Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Grade The Panthers: Bengals Game


Skew

Recommended Posts

QB: D+ (better than Moore, but that's not saying much; fumble)

RB: C (still blame Davidson and OL for poor performance; fumble)

WR: C+ (improvement over last week)

OL: F (these guy can't pass block or run block consistantly)

DL: C+ (better pressure for 4 quarters than last week)

LB: B (as Kurb said to me during the game, you can build a team around Beason)

DB: B+ (much improvement over last week with the INTs and coverage)

ST: B (again, better than last week; no turnovers, but no big plays either)

Coaching: D- (do I really need to make a comment?)

Overall: D-

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QB: D+ (better than Moore, but that's not saying much; fumble)

RB: C (still blame Davidson and OL for poor performance; fumble)

WR: C+ (improvement over last week)

OL: F (these guy can't pass block or run block consistantly)

DL: C+ (better pressure for 4 quarters than last week)

LB: B (as Kurb said to me during the game, you can build a team around Beason)

DB: B+ (much improvement over last week with the INTs and coverage)

ST: B (again, better than last week; no turnovers, but no big plays either)

Coaching: D- (do I really need to make a comment?)

Overall: D-

only one I disagree with is LB and DB, I believe DB should be a B- and LB should be a C (LB could not get off blocks on the screen passes)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QB - C- (Did ok, considering what he had to work with. At no moment did I slap my face and say WTF ARE YOU DOING like when Moore was in there the past two games)

RBs - C+ (Deangelo did better than the previous two games, Stewart did not.)

WRs - C (Gettis played relatively well, Lafell had 1 nice catch, but shoulda made the catch in the end zone. Smitty was Smitty when Jimmy finally started throwing him the ball)

OL - F- (Seriously Kalil, those two botched snaps were all on him....the first was up in Jimmy's chest instead of his hands, the second barely made it to Jimmy's fingertips. Blocking was terrible overall too)

DL - B- (Yay, a DLman got a sack. Decent pressure most of the night, good run defense early in the game. Broke down though.)

LBs - C+ (Anderson F'd up big on Benson's TD reception. Overall not great by the LB corps)

DBs - B (Did pretty decently against 2 elite (but aging) WRs. Had about 2 or 3 fewer INTs than they should have...)

Special Teams - B (Cosby couldn't return for poo against them, and Goodson did ok overall)

Coaching - F- (I almost want to take away the minus because they actually looked better in the second half than first, but then I remember there was only like 15 rushes in the game total and the gameplanning in general seemed to suck)

Overall - D (Overall offense looked like it has the ability to grow, but not until the O-line gets their poo straight. Maybe it's the lack of Otah, I dunno. Defense looked pretty good for the most part, considering the field position they were constantly dealing with).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You and I both know there isn't a coach we could or can still hire that can "fix" Bryce Young. Even at mighty Alabama with one of the best modern coaches in college football history Mac Jones was still a better QB than Bryce Young. Mac Jones.... We already know how you feel about Canales on a personal level so in that regard you wanting him fired is not news. You don't have to disguise it behind this shroud of rabble about not fixing Bryce Young. To his credit he somehow had us competive against the Chiefs and the Eagles on the road with #9. But no coaching staff can overcome their starting QB turning the ball over 4 times. We definitely have developed some of our younger offensive pieces. And as far as Evero goes he has earned criticism and if he's fired so be it but in his defense many of us said in the offseason this defensive roster was a disaster waiting to happen given the resources we spent on the offense while neglecting the defense. That was Dan Morgan's plan. He swung too hard toward offense to salvage the Bryce Young trade. That's on him. We can scream about XL all we want but at least he's actually been on the field for the most part. The Brooks pick was a luxury pick at the time and now it is a Hurney level blunder. Dan Morgan has gotten a lot of early praise here when in reality he's unequivocally deserving of significant criticism. But if you say that some people get up in arms because he's a former Panther. Big whoop. He has just as much to prove this upcoming season as Canales. That's why to me in my own personal opinion I say one more season and then if it's more of the same say goodbye to both.
    • It's a decent vid with compelling reasons for his opinion. But, my thing is is that you simply can't draft McMillan thinking he is a surefire WR1. There are questions. His 40---rightly or wrongly---will play a part. I'd think that his splits (which will speak more to his game translating to the pros in my mind) are more important.  As much as you're trying to sell us that McMillan is a don't-overthink-it-type-of-player, I wouldn't say that's the case. Workouts will play a part in all of this.  At this point, I like the thought of Tetairoa. That's as much as I can give you right now.
×
×
  • Create New...