Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

fox defend staff use of peppers.


carpanfan96

Recommended Posts

The link:

Coach John Fox said today the Panthers will do what’s best for their team regarding Julius Peppers and defended his staff’s use of the four-time Pro Bowl defensive end in its defensive scheme.

When asked to respond to statements by Peppers’ agent, Carl Carey, that Peppers wants to move on to another team and believes he must do so to reach his full potential as a player, Fox told the Observer:

“All I can say is we’ve got other options and we’re going to do what’s best for our football team. I haven’t heard that from Julius’ mouth, so I’m figuring it’s all speculation. I can’t say it isn’t true. … But we have other options.”

The Panthers have the option of placing their franchise tag on Peppers to either trade him or try to force him to play under a one-year tender offer, which is required to be around $17 million.

Carey said he told Panthers general manager Marty Hurney of Peppers’ position on Thursday in Housto, where Carey lives. Hurney was in town attending practices for the East-West Shrine all-star game.

Carey told the Observer Saturday that Peppers is intrigued by the possibility of playing in a 3-4 defense and that Peppers believes he’s maximized what he can do with Carolina and wants to play in a different defensive system.

Fox’s response to that?

“I’ll just say this,” he said. “We’ve never held players back.”

Peppers had a career high 14 ½ sacks this and holds the team career record with 70 ½ sacks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hold on-- BEFORE I read it, I am gonna take a crack at what Fox says;

Q- How do you feel about Peppers comments out not reaching his potential?"

Fox- "well, we have had Julius here for my whole tenure, he has made four pro bowls, Defensive player of the year and has been an all pro. I would say that we have done something right"

Q- What do you say about the scheme"

Fox- I have full confidence in my coaching staff. Our defense has ranked in the upper tier of the league, and my staff does an excellent job of putting our guys in position to make plays.

Q- "what do you say about Julius wanting our of Carolina"

Fox- Peppers i his own man, he has played very hard for us and has excelled here.

Ok- I have to go read now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

HAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Good one.

I guess you would have ran the same defense that we ran vs AZ.

ROFL

You mean the one where Peppers was invisible and single-teamed all night by a journeyman tackle?

Of course I would have run a different scheme. The question is, would Peppers have been any better at execution?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You mean the one where Peppers was invisible and single-teamed all night by a journeyman tackle?

Of course I would have run a different scheme. The question is, would Peppers have been any better at execution?

it's impossible to pressure a qb when his #1 wr is wide open. a cyborg reggie white would've had the same game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You mean the one where Peppers was invisible and single-teamed all night by a journeyman tackle?

Of course I would have run a different scheme. The question is, would Peppers have been any better at execution?

The answer is yes, other coaches get more out of worse players than Peppers because they know how to put them in positions to succeed.

Even if you drop Peppers from the whole argument, would our other players be better in a different scheme?

It is obvious our scheme sucks, so I really don't even care who is on the defense, coaches should be able to do something that works with their personnel.

You can't just assume Peppers is going to make every play just because he is a beast. And if you see him getting handled, do some other poo, confuse the offense, DO SOMETHING. Not just drop back in a soft zone and hope our only player makes something happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You mean the one where Peppers was invisible and single-teamed all night by a journeyman tackle?

Of course I would have run a different scheme. The question is, would Peppers have been any better at execution?

We are talking about Peppers and his lack of pressure, when the only man who needed to be defended was a WR, who was never covered. It didn't take Warner 5 seconds to locate Fitz. Fitz was open within a 3 step drop.

Peppers is now a scapegoat in the Arizona debacle. You have to be kidding me. We are all entitled to our opinions, and clearly you opine Peppers to be very overrated. Clearly we disagree, and that's fine. But, Peppers didn't throw 5 INTs and fumble once, (4 times within a given Red Zone). Nor did Peppers allow Fitz to go off for 180 yards. Nor did it matter that he didn't sack Warner as many of their plays were off on 3 step drops.

To the thread title...of course Fox is going to defend their use of a player. Who wouldn't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Peppers is making a mistake. He is not built to play OLBer...he's built to be a DE in a 4-3.

Either way, the Panthers tried lining him up in just about every possible position in the last couple of years except for MLBer, corner, and safety. There were even times when it looked like Peppers was allowed to free lance...that second Saints game comes to mind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Agreed on the last part. They can’t afford to lose all these games with Martin and Perets. 
    • Yes.  And this converts directly to confidence.  Does the coach have confidence to call a deep dig or seam route?  Does Bryce have confidence in his ability to be the Alpha?  Do his teammates have confidence.  About film--when I see Cam Newton's pre-snap confidence vs. Bryce's, it is night and day.   Film--tells you if the WRs are open (why l love watching the Replay telecasts from the end zone cameras--you can see it.  I have seen 2 WRs open and Bryce's eyes are on the outlet WR or the pass rush. )  You can see progressions, and he has improved a bit--but he is very quick to rush through 1 and 2 and checkdown--that is a lack of confidence in his ability to read the defense.  I had a former NFL TE (Deems Maye) who played QB in high school (not sure about college) tell me that the best QBs read the defense by knowing where everyone will be when the ball is to arrive--not where they are.  I think his QB at the time was Humphries.  He said that Humphries would throw the ball into coverage before the cuts etc.  because he understood DB momentum, zone areas, etc.  and he could just see it.  Said so when people say nobody was open, they are usually right because nobody should be "open" when the QB has the ball--when the ball arrives, everyone should be open.  He said Humphries was never "great" but his skills were limited--from a small school--but his ability to read a defense made him never give up on a route.
    • People here get mad when I tell them I prefer Miracle Whip over Dukes
×
×
  • Create New...