Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Would you trade...

Matt Foley

By Matt Foley,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

grateflday Collaborator

grateflday

Posted
Posted

The only way I wouldnt trade D'Will to anybody is if the Panthers either sign him now to a long term deal (which in the past they would have, but not now cause of the CBA) or if they plan to franchise tag him. Otherwise, if this season continues to go down hill fast, they should trade him for picks because losing him as a free agent with nothing to show for it would be just dumb.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PanthersPhan18 Newbie

PanthersPhan18

Posted
Posted

that's insane.. DWill can't run because we NEED more receivers.. There is NO way DWill would be more important than a star receiver.. plus both are young and will hold the #1 WR spot for years..

Stewart and Goodson will be just fine, and the addition of Jackson/Bryant will open the field up- to, ya know, RUN the ball efficiently..

Bryant has the potential, but isn't a #1 WR yet. If Clausen turns out to be an above average qb, (I think he'll be a good one) then Williams for Jackson would be a good deal, but you don't know that yet. What good is a team with star wrs if their qb is trash? The Ravens have very good receiving corps, yet they still struggle on the passing game due to how bad Joe Flacco has been for them so far.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
kdrh5 Newbie

kdrh5

Posted
Posted

I don't have enough faith in Jonathan Stewart's durability to trade Williams for anybody.

Keep the band together and use next year's first pick on the best receiver available.

Which running back has missed more games due to injury in the past two years?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted

Which running back has missed more games due to injury in the past two years?

Williams has only missed three. Stewart hasn't missed any yet, but he's a perpetual practice scratch and with an increased workload, who knows?

I prefer having two stud RBs who can split time (and no, Goodson isn't there yet).

Link to comment
Share on other sites
kdrh5 Newbie

kdrh5

Posted
Posted

With an increased workload and no practice Stewart simply went on to lead the team in rushing and prove he was Deangelos equal and maybe the best rb on the roster. Two starting rbs in a passing league is a luxury, and if this team had the opportunity to bolster our weakest position on the team with a possible stud wr at the cost of losing one of them they'd have to consider it. And seriously, running backs , especially backup rbs, are relatively easy to find, as evidenced by the fact we have about three good ones at the moment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
bleys Newbie

bleys

Posted
Posted

Bryant has the potential, but isn't a #1 WR yet. If Clausen turns out to be an above average qb, (I think he'll be a good one) then Williams for Jackson would be a good deal, but you don't know that yet. What good is a team with star wrs if their qb is trash? The Ravens have very good receiving corps, yet they still struggle on the passing game due to how bad Joe Flacco has been for them so far.

I think you're point is exactly the same for our run game.. at least with some receivers we are balanced.. right now we can't do poo...

wouldn't it make sense to balance our offense out?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PantherPhann Newbie

PantherPhann

Posted
Posted

DeAngelo Williams to Dallas for Dez Bryant?

No I would not. We are a run first team and I'll be glad when we get back to running the rock. We didn't try to turn Delhomme into P. Manning so why are we trying it with Moore? Is Fox gamplan to make him fail to prove to everyone that he was right for not pulling his boy and starting Moore. All our QB need to do is establish the pass, so we can hit the ground running. I think we put to much attention on the pass this offseason that we forgot to run. The only thing I would agree with is trading Sutton for a good, better than what we have, WR to help Smith. And we better resign D. Will.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PantherPhann Newbie

PantherPhann

Posted
Posted

DeAngelo Williams to Dallas for Dez Bryant?

No I would not. We are a run first team and I'll be glad when we get back to running the rock. We didn't try to turn Delhomme into P. Manning so why are we trying it with Moore? Is Fox gamplan to make him fail to prove to everyone that he was right for not pulling his boy and starting Moore. All our QB need to do is establish the pass, so we can hit the ground running. I think we put to much attention on the pass this offseason that we forgot to run. The only thing I would agree with is trading Sutton for a good, better than what we have, WR to help Smith. And we better resign D. Will.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
bleys Newbie

bleys

Posted
Posted

No I would not. We are a run first team and I'll be glad when we get back to running the rock. We didn't try to turn Delhomme into P. Manning so why are we trying it with Moore? Is Fox gamplan to make him fail to prove to everyone that he was right for not pulling his boy and starting Moore. All our QB need to do is establish the pass, so we can hit the ground running. I think we put to much attention on the pass this offseason that we forgot to run. The only thing I would agree with is trading Sutton for a good, better than what we have, WR to help Smith. And we better resign D. Will.

get back to running the rock? we only gave that up late in the 4th when we are down and forced to pass...

with that in mind, how do you figure Moore was forced to be Peyton with less than 20 attempts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
The Saltman Apprentice

The Saltman

Posted
Posted

No I would not. We are a run first team and I'll be glad when we get back to running the rock. We didn't try to turn Delhomme into P. Manning so why are we trying it with Moore? Is Fox gamplan to make him fail to prove to everyone that he was right for not pulling his boy and starting Moore. All our QB need to do is establish the pass, so we can hit the ground running. I think we put to much attention on the pass this offseason that we forgot to run. The only thing I would agree with is trading Sutton for a good, better than what we have, WR to help Smith. And we better resign D. Will.

No I would not. We are a run first team and I'll be glad when we get back to running the rock. We didn't try to turn Delhomme into P. Manning so why are we trying it with Moore? Is Fox gamplan to make him fail to prove to everyone that he was right for not pulling his boy and starting Moore. All our QB need to do is establish the pass, so we can hit the ground running. I think we put to much attention on the pass this offseason that we forgot to run. The only thing I would agree with is trading Sutton for a good, better than what we have, WR to help Smith. And we better resign D. Will.

i heard u the first time

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...