Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

A look at team spending for 2010


pantherj

Recommended Posts

Redskins: $178.2 million. Typical.

Cowboys: $166.5 million.

Saints: $145.0 million. Back to back SB champs?

Vikings: $143.4 million. Oh man they gotta be feeling bad.

Seahawks: $138.8 million.

Jets: $135.7 million.

Packers: $135.3 million. Best team in NFL?

Raiders: $135.2 million. Oh dear.

Colts: $133.1 million.

Bears: $131.9 million. Peppers come back!

Eagles: $131.0 million.

Patriots: $128.8 million.

Giants: $128.6 million.

49ers: $125.9 million.

Dolphins: $123.8 million.

Texans: $123.1 million.

Lions: $122.9 million.

Steelers: $122.9 million.

Browns: $122.8 million. Go get em' Jake! Never return.

Ravens: $122.3 million.

Falcons: $118.5 million.

Titans: $118.0 million.

Panthers: $110.9 million. :puke:

Rams: $109.1 million.

Chargers: $108.0 million.

Bills: $105.3 million.

Broncos: $102.9 million.

Bengals: $100.8 million.

Cardinals: $97.8 million.

Jaguars: $89.5 million.

Chiefs: $84.5 million.

Buccaneers: $80.8 million. Florida teams just don't get funded.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This made me feel much better. We just got hosed on our home field by a team paying out 30 million dollars less than us. Great.

Well if you want to feel better, I think Jake counts for $12,000,000 and he's in Cleveland. Thomas Davis wasn't on the field either, so there wasn't as much of a gap as it appears.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Redskins: $178.2 million. Typical.

Cowboys: $166.5 million. 0-2

Saints: $145.0 million. Back to back SB champs? Didn't look like sb champs on MNF

Panthers: $110.9 million. :puke:

Chiefs: $84.5 million. 2-0

Buccaneers: $80.8 million. Florida teams just don't get funded. 2-0

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think this article can shut up people saying we're bad because JR is cheap. The two cheapest teams are 2-0 and the Cowboys who just throw money at players is 0-2. We're not 0-2 because our owner is cheap but we're 0-2 because our organization from ownership/management down to players make bad/questionable decisions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think this article can shut up people saying we're bad because JR is cheap. The two cheapest teams are 2-0 and the Cowboys who just throw money at players is 0-2. We're not 0-2 because our owner is cheap but we're 0-2 because our organization from ownership/management down to players make bad/questionable decisions.

We are 0-2 because coaches/mgmt never bothered to get a good successor to Delhommey, and stuck with him for entirely to long.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...