Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

This is all Jerry's fault


Eazy-E

Recommended Posts

I don't care what anyone says, when it comes down to it our team sucks because the moves our owner made this off season were terrible. Why in the world would you trade Harris for a back up LB, release hoover, and Release Diggs. None of those moves make any football sense.

I also feel that he is almost trying to sabotage Smith. I mean He is getting old and has been asking for help and you can't even grant his wish after everything he has done for your team. I mean come on no wonder Peppers wanted to leave so bad. He must have realized he was getting older, wasn't going to get any help on the D line, and now he is filthy rich and sitting at 2-0.

If you want to say that it falls more on the coaches then be my guest but think about like this. You are a coach trying to keep your job and your owner is hanging you out to dry. How are you supposed to coach a team when you have gaping holes everywhere on your roster and your owner won't let you address any of them.

I just find this unacceptable as a fan and I believe the team feels the same way by the look of their play on the field. It looks like the majority of the team is playing with no heart and knows already that this is going to be a long rough season. And don't even bring up the lockout because we seem to be the only team in the league that gives two shits about it. Everyone else in the league were plenty active as we just sat back and watched our team become worse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah I can't stand to read these boards sometimes and that is why I don't post as much as I would like. But I needed to get that one off my chest. I have been a fan for too long and It just ticks me off. I am just glad other fans out there agree with me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Harris and Diggs are close to done, those moves didn't hurt us. It was the moves we didn't make that hurt us, but I agree, it's on him. fug him, hope he enjoys his fuging wine and cheese while he's caking it up in the box watching dumbass fans continue to fill the stadium to watch a shitty ass team with horrible coaches.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes and if we do save money and there is a Lockout, what big name winning players will want to go to a losing team even if they will make a lot of money. Makes me wonder if we will even be able to resign our big names after this season since so many of them need big contracts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...