Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Chris Harris on WFNZ now

Guest

By Guest,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

rayzor Grand Master

rayzor

Posted
Posted

great interview, though.

incredibly disappointed with the loss, still bitter.

he said they did change to man coverage in the second and was able to shut down the card offense pretty well. lesson learned there, imo. man>zone.

he said he liked the system because it allows them to play. said the problem was more because of player mistakes than the system.

still said that it was just a bad game and they picked the wrong day to have a bad game.

he wants peppers to be back and said that he was a very big part of the team not only on the field with the way he plays but what he did in practice and meetings in being a vocal leader.

he said there will be some tweaking in the defense.

said that even though the coaches didn't get on to marshall with the unsportsmanlike conduct he and other players got him and he knew how bad that was.

one thing that i loved was how he said the situation is eerily similar to what he had in chicago in 2005. bears had a bye week and the panthers came in and beat them in chicago. they came back the next year and went to the superbowl. he said he mentioned that in the locker room and just smiled.

panthers are not done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ShutDwn Newbie

ShutDwn

Posted
Posted

one thing that i loved was how he said the situation is eerily similar to what he had in chicago in 2005. bears had a bye week and the panthers came in and beat them in chicago. they came back the next year and went to the superbowl. he said he mentioned that in the locker room and just smiled.

panthers are not done.

That tough NFC North and the NFC west sure did pose a challenge the next year right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest

Guest

Posted
Posted

I think he is just trying not to step on any toes. That zone defense that allowed the Cards to own our secondary the first half was all Turg and Fox, not the players.

Thats true, but even I, a football novice, noticed several blown coverages in the first half (or the first quarter, I couldn't watch the game any more and deleted the recording)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      With the first pick, don't draft a QB? Draft a DE? C'mon!

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      Did we take over a thread about who you'd take #1 by having a debate on who you'd take #1? Basically you still don't want to answer my question, probably because your answer would be either T-Mac like myself, or Hunter, which taking a CB #1 overall is even crazier on the surface than what you're saying I'm stupid for in wanting a WR there. As I've said before, it's a season without a traditional clear top pick(s).  It would be great if we could trade back if we got #1, but if not, there's nothing wrong with taking a truly elite WR and build out our roster correctly for once instead of always trying to find the quick fix and it backfiring. 
    • tukafan21
      With the first pick, don't draft a QB? Draft a DE? C'mon!

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I just thought of an interesting comparison for what I'm arguing with taking T-Mac and how to build up to hopefully being a contender. The mid 2000's Arizona Cardinals In 2003 they took Anquan Boldin early in the 2nd, kinda a decent comp for Legette with style of play and being more of an elite #2 than a true outside #1 (they also took a WR in the 1st too who didn't pan out). In 2004 they took Larry Fitzgerald #3 overall, the true outside #1. Their QB's at the time, Jeff Blake and Josh McCown The QB they passed on to take Fizgerald, Philip Rivers. They were in the Super Bowl a few years later after they found their QB in Warner to slot into an already built out roster of elite weapons. Cam, you asked how it would look if we passed on a QB who pans out for a WR, well, do you think the Cardinals regret taking Fitz over Rivers?  I highly doubt it. Our roster is more than one offseason away from contending.  I'm not looking for the quick fix because there isn't one with the state of this franchise at the moment, I'm looking to contend for a decade. I don't think a QB in this draft class is good enough to take 1st overall with everything else we still need.  My next preference would be an elite pass rusher, but again, I don't see one of them in this draft either. My personal bias aside, I very honestly think T-Mac is the most can't miss offensive prospect in this draft (Hunter would be that on defense).  He is the WR we've been trying to get since we lost Smitty.   Brooks, T-Mac, Legette, Coker/FA, Sanders would have the potential to be one of the best offensive weapon sets in the NFL.  Sure, hopefully we could hit on a superstar QB in the next draft, but even if not, if those guys pan out, with them all are in their prime together, we wouldn't need a Mahomes or Allen to contend, we'd only need to find our Jared Goff. and spend all our FA money the next couple offseason on Defense.
    • R0CKnR0LLA
      Chase Daniels breaks down Bryce vs DEN

      By R0CKnR0LLA · Posted

      Competent QBs can read defenses presnap, see where their best matchups are and already know where they're going with the ball. Then have good footwork with fast fundamentally sound dropbacks. See the field well and decisive with their decisions on where to go with the ball. And an NFL caliber arm, get the ball out quickly and deliver it with velocity. Bryce can do none of these things.
×
×
  • Create New...