Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What are you more upset about?


panthers1789

Recommended Posts

My level of upset goes like this, with the most upset at the top:

fans that want to get rid of Jake for this bad game.

(his good game/bad game ratio is better than most starting qbs)

Turg hasn't been fired yet.

Defense hasn't played worth a poo in months (see above)

secondary leaving Fitz open

Jakes turnovers

Fox's game planning

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All of you who are bitching about the zone coverage. It was zone coverage the Cards were using to limit Steve Smith to ZERO catches (with the help of Jake being lame) for almost a full 3 quarters. The difference is execution. Learn it, or stop complaining about something you don't understand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All of you who are bitching about the zone coverage. It was zone coverage the Cards were using to limit Steve Smith to ZERO catches (with the help of Jake being lame) for almost a full 3 quarters. The difference is execution. Learn it, or stop complaining about something you don't understand.

Ummmm.. yea.. OUR execution of OUR zone was pretty much the problem.. What don't you understand about that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Im upset because the panthers are a better team than that and they should have stomped on the cards. 2 weeks to prepare and the coaching staff comes up with a bullshit game plan. They also abandoned the run when they could have kept going. They panicked 14-7 and tried to make Jake pass to victory.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All of you who are bitching about the zone coverage. It was zone coverage the Cards were using to limit Steve Smith to ZERO catches (with the help of Jake being lame) for almost a full 3 quarters. The difference is execution. Learn it, or stop complaining about something you don't understand.

Different coverages work for different teams.

Our coaches saw it wasnt working and they still didn't adjust.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • As I said less than 10 minutes into the game, Boston looks nothing like we're used to seeing. Regardless, any curb-stomping of the Bruins is welcome.  The scorers all got the glory tonight, but all 6 D-men had excellent games. Across the board- Gost, Orlov, Chatty, Walker and, of course, Slavin & Burns.
    • I just tried a few mock draft simulators and this is the only way lol. Nothing else makes sense. 
    • No, biggest weakness is pass rush, but I don't think there is a blue chip can't miss DE prospect to take at #1 this year, same as with QB.  But beyond that, moving forward, yea WR is a pretty damn big weakness. We have 1 game this season over 224 yards passing and just traded away our best WR (who wasn't going to re-sign here anyways).  That WR no longer on the team was also the only player we've had this year who had over 78 yards receiving in a game.  So again, yea, WR is one of our biggest weaknesses even right now, let alone moving into the future. As I just said in my other post, I love Legette, but he's not going to be a Top 5-10 WR type of guy, Top 15-20 I can see, I think he can be a good #1 WR or an elite #2. After that, what do we have for the future?  Thielen isn't part of it, sure as hell isn't going to be Mingo, and as much as we all like Coker, in no world is Coker as our #2 to Legette as the #1 going be considered as "having weapons" at WR, even with Brooks and Sanders. But put someone like T-Mac into that group, who I genuinely think is going to be a Top 5 WR in this league for a long time, and it changes things.  A Top 5 WR with Legette/Coker as the 2/3, along with Brooks and Sanders, has the potential to be one of the best set of offensive weapons in the league if they reach their potential.  
×
×
  • Create New...