Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

qb question...


pnthrfrk

Recommended Posts

Just heard sanchez is leaving usc. i for one think he's leaving too early and that might cause him to be drafted later. i don't follow college football that much so where does he fall in regards to the qb's declaring for the draft? assuming pep does in fact get traded for a first and a couple midround picks, which qb and what round would everyone feel comfortable with a qb selection? i think we at least need to bring in some new blood at qb whether it's delhomme leading us for another year or not. we should let em all duke it out from ground zero and let tbe best man win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just heard sanchez is leaving usc. i for one think he's leaving too early and that might cause him to be drafted later. i don't follow college football that much so where does he fall in regards to the qb's declaring for the draft? assuming pep does in fact get traded for a first and a couple midround picks, which qb and what round would everyone feel comfortable with a qb selection? i think we at least need to bring in some new blood at qb whether it's delhomme leading us for another year or not. we should let em all duke it out from ground zero and let tbe best man win.

I agree with you one that. We need someone to compete with Jake.

As far as Sanchez.. I could be wrong, but living in Southern California and being able to watch all of the USC games, I feel Mark is overrated and making a big mistake. The kid has never in his career felt pressure from a defense. He has all day to throw the ball at USC. This will not be the case in the pro's. If any of you watched the Rose Bowl. He only posted up numbers like that because he had until the end of January to find a target and allow them to get open. Mark Sanchez = Matt Leinart

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yea this guy is talented and smart, doubt he'll be there but hey that'd be awesome, showed he can play in big games even against the doubter, he lit up Penn State with like 4 tds in the bowl game

Paterno even said the dude was one of the best qbs he's even faced!! the guy has been around forever so thats a lot of qbs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

w0000000 so i am the champion lol i dont know how ot resize it, not computer savy

I was at that game. Gave my wife tickets for her birthday...still living that one down. Got any pictures of the very top and a telephoto lens? Maybe you can see me. I'm the guy with the angry looking wife.

If I remember correctly it was Michael Gaines 4th quarter FTW!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Did we take over a thread about who you'd take #1 by having a debate on who you'd take #1? Basically you still don't want to answer my question, probably because your answer would be either T-Mac like myself, or Hunter, which taking a CB #1 overall is even crazier on the surface than what you're saying I'm stupid for in wanting a WR there. As I've said before, it's a season without a traditional clear top pick(s).  It would be great if we could trade back if we got #1, but if not, there's nothing wrong with taking a truly elite WR and build out our roster correctly for once instead of always trying to find the quick fix and it backfiring. 
    • I just thought of an interesting comparison for what I'm arguing with taking T-Mac and how to build up to hopefully being a contender. The mid 2000's Arizona Cardinals In 2003 they took Anquan Boldin early in the 2nd, kinda a decent comp for Legette with style of play and being more of an elite #2 than a true outside #1 (they also took a WR in the 1st too who didn't pan out). In 2004 they took Larry Fitzgerald #3 overall, the true outside #1. Their QB's at the time, Jeff Blake and Josh McCown The QB they passed on to take Fizgerald, Philip Rivers. They were in the Super Bowl a few years later after they found their QB in Warner to slot into an already built out roster of elite weapons. Cam, you asked how it would look if we passed on a QB who pans out for a WR, well, do you think the Cardinals regret taking Fitz over Rivers?  I highly doubt it. Our roster is more than one offseason away from contending.  I'm not looking for the quick fix because there isn't one with the state of this franchise at the moment, I'm looking to contend for a decade. I don't think a QB in this draft class is good enough to take 1st overall with everything else we still need.  My next preference would be an elite pass rusher, but again, I don't see one of them in this draft either. My personal bias aside, I very honestly think T-Mac is the most can't miss offensive prospect in this draft (Hunter would be that on defense).  He is the WR we've been trying to get since we lost Smitty.   Brooks, T-Mac, Legette, Coker/FA, Sanders would have the potential to be one of the best offensive weapon sets in the NFL.  Sure, hopefully we could hit on a superstar QB in the next draft, but even if not, if those guys pan out, with them all are in their prime together, we wouldn't need a Mahomes or Allen to contend, we'd only need to find our Jared Goff. and spend all our FA money the next couple offseason on Defense.
    • Competent QBs can read defenses presnap, see where their best matchups are and already know where they're going with the ball. Then have good footwork with fast fundamentally sound dropbacks. See the field well and decisive with their decisions on where to go with the ball. And an NFL caliber arm, get the ball out quickly and deliver it with velocity. Bryce can do none of these things.
×
×
  • Create New...