Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Hmmm..didnt see this happening


Nu Guns

Recommended Posts

Whats this??? We cant pass the ball?

Gee...I didnt see this coming.

Its pre-season..."it doesnt matter that we didnt score...were not going to give any real looks of our play calling"....BLA BLA FUC*KING BLA !!!

Where was Dwill in the 2nd half??!!

Why arent we using our backs more in the passing game, since our WR'S suck!! (not you smitty)

Looking at plays...yes Moore's passing options were usually crap, but 3 redZone INTS !!!???:mad2: If he had just 3 ints I wouldnt be saying this...but his decision making in the redzone....makes this easy.

Play Clausin.

Oh...P.S.

Get a fuc*king WR!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Where was Dwill in the 2nd half??!!

Why arent we using our backs more in the passing game, since our WR'S suck!! (not you smitty)

Oh...P.S.

Get a fuc*king WR!!

When we drafted Clausen, and not a WR (Golden Tate was on the board), I was screaming "WTF!!!". Now, he might turn out to be good... maybe great... but not with the receivers we have right now (Smitty not included), and not with the O-line play we currently have.

And where was D-Will... how about "Where was JStew, for the WHOLE game"? He had 6 touches for 12 yards... wtf?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Im still trying to figure out why we need a receiver? so if we had Vincent Jackson we would have won? try again

Vincent Jackson would have been able to jump 20 feet in the air to catch each interception that Moore threw into double/triple/quadruple coverage. obviously.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Im still trying to figure out why we need a receiver? so if we had Vincent Jackson we would have won? try again

We are one-dimensional. What's so hard to understand about that. Unless we are in Shotgun, we run a two receiver set, and Smitty can't USUALLY do poo because he is double covered (unless he makes an incredibly athletic play).

If we had two LEGIT WR threats... teams would have to play back. But right now they can single-man-cover us, stack the box, and punish our O-line.

So yes, another receiver who wasn't dropping passes might have made a huge difference yesterday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Nah you are just haven't watched all of the playoffs....   And im referring the playoffs were hes currently sitting at .895 % and over 3 gaa    But again gotta beat the best.   Those of you who are gonna act like chicken littles before a matchup is even decided lol
    • No, I don't root for drops to be what loses a game, especially from a player who has/had drop issues, as that's not showing improvement. And no, I don't resent it if they win, just as I don't "celebrate" if we lose either.  But I don't get upset if we lose because I know it's for the best for our future, just like I don't go running through the streets celebrating a meaningless December win that doesn't do anything other than hurt our draft stock in a lost season. In a year like last year and this next year, where we've put considerable assets into the offense at the expense of our defense to be fixed later, something both fans and the team themselves know, as you can only add so many players in any given offseason.  Then I'm looking for us to click offensively, have everyone looking better than the year before and show growth.   But then the side of our team we know is a weakness, to be the reason we lose in a high scoring game.  Give me Bryce going down and taking a 2 point lead with 2-3 minutes left in the game, but then our defense almost holding the other team from getting into scoring position and they end up needing a 55 yard FG to win the game and beat us. That can happen while our young defensive players show tons of promise, but still have one or two too many holes and/or just inexperience that it costs us games in the end, but it's still a successful season of growth and improvement. Or even better, just look great on both sides in a close game and end up getting totally screwed by the refs with a bad late call that hands them the game. And again, those are the kinds of things I'm wanting to see happen once it's already a lost season.   And I'm only saying I'd rather not make the playoffs when the alternate scenario is making but losing in the first round. Because those are the scenarios where we improve as a team, get better draft picks, and an easier schedule the next year.  You then use the cap space and higher draft picks to fill the remaining defensive holes with impact players and you're then cooking with gas in that next season and have real potential.
    • He's getting hot again. He always has a playoff streak. 
×
×
  • Create New...