Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Moose on WFNZ Right Now


Jbro

Recommended Posts

1st question:How Do you feel about the loss.

Moose:We picked a bad day to have a bad day and it is what it is.

I am not joking that is exactly what Moose said, and I then turned off the radio. The interview still should be going on now though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So sorry, it was not a bad day.

A scheme is developed over several days when preparing for a team.

So really, it was a bad week.

Two weeks to rest, prepare, figure out a way to stop Fitzgerald and we run the same thing we did the first time, and we chalk it up to a bad day?

I don't think so.

In any other business, if an employee was as ill prepared as Fox had this team, they would be fired right after.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So sorry, it was not a bad day.

A scheme is developed over several days when preparing for a team.

So really, it was a bad week.

Really it was a bad 3 Months cause of D has not been able to cover or pressure poo since we came back from the bye.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought the "bad day to have a bad day line" was a good one by Fox. Apparently I am in the minority though. :)

You get tired of the It is what it is every time. Its just another spin off from that. If Fox would have said YEA WE fugED UP then I think the fans would have been more excepting of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You get tired of the It is what it is every time. Its just another spin off from that. If Fox would have said YEA WE f*ckED UP then I think the fans would have been more excepting of it.

That makes sense, didn't view it as a spin off from that. Andy Reid's famous line after a loss is "I didn't put the players in the right postion to succeed"...each and everytime....it makes me want to throw up. I see your point now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I complete disagree. Who is available is extremely relevant. If you have a couple of players you would be happy with and you can still get them if you trade back, you should do that in a heartbeat. Being afraid that people will lowball you next year is an odd stance. Then you just say no next year, problem solved. In this particular draft you can get a very good player at 46. But to each their own.
    • I don't think so.  Watson really screwed them up.  I see something happening, but do not know what.  Cousins could be had in a trade--but they liked Flacco when he played there.  If it were me, I would not spend the #2 pick on Sanders.  I would go after a tier 2 qb because I think Will Howard is going to start in the NFL soon, and I think Ewers was rated very high at the beginning of the year--he knows adversity and he beat out a Manning while taking Texas to 2 playoff appearances.  I am not good at picking QBs, but I think Howard's run pass option and his accuracy is going to help someone.  Stay in Ohio and play for the Browns behind Flacco--
    • After Cam at #1, there are three or four elite players and there could be a trade--If I am the Giants and I am needed a winning season badly and I have several needs, I might trade out and pick up mid first and an extra second rounder, including a QB--while nobody is going to move up to #3 for Sanders, they might for Carter or Hunter.  If the Giants then move back, Sanders could still be in play.  That could be the trade in the top 3.  New England wants Campbell and I get that; Jacksonville at #5 could move back if someone wants Graham or Jeanty.  But barring some trade, the top 4 are probably locked in. So it could be 2 hours into the draft before we get any surprises. Nice list, by the way--you nailed it.
×
×
  • Create New...