Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Should we go after Nate Davis?

PanthersPhan18

By PanthersPhan18,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Sam Mills Fan Newbie

Sam Mills Fan

Posted
Posted

If we didn't already have Moore, I'd say definitely. However, unless we can draft a top 10 top-quality qb, it wouldn't make sense to have two young, developing quarterbacks with a lot of potential at the same time behind Jake. We especially shouldn't when you consider the other needs on the team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
raleigh-panther Grand Master

raleigh-panther

Posted
Posted

If we didn't already have Moore, I'd say definitely. However, unless we can draft a top 10 top-quality qb, it wouldn't make sense to have two young, developing quarterbacks with a lot of potential at the same time behind Jake. We especially shouldn't when you consider the other needs on the team.

Could we not trade one?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bruce Wayne Newbie

Bruce Wayne

Posted
Posted

I do agree that they should go after a QB early in the draft but I'm not sold on Nate Davis. For those of you who think I want them to get rid of Delhomme, I think they should keep him and let a young QB groom under him. And I'm sorry but I don't see Matt Moore as being that QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bignick2700 Newbie

Bignick2700

Posted
Posted

Sorry PanthersPhan18 but I want the Panthers to stay away from Nate Davis. I go to Ball State and have had the opportunity to cover and interview Nate many times and as much as I'd love to see him have success in the league, I don't want the Panthers to take a chance on him. He came to Ball State because the school was one of the few that said they would work with Nate because of his learning disorder, and there was a rumor going around that Nate didn't completely learn the playbook until half way through his sophomore year. I know he has the physical tools to get it done at the next level but trust me when he sits down with an NFL scout or coach, they are going to be turned off with the lack of substance your going to get when he opens his mouth. He’s just not all there. Bill Polian came to the Ball State game against Northern Illinois and I asked him about Nate, and he said that he needed another year. I'm rooting for him, but I don't think he's going to struggle at this level.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
scpanther22 Experienced

scpanther22

Posted
Posted

Sorry PanthersPhan18 but I want the Panthers to stay away from Nate Davis. I go to Ball State and have had the opportunity to cover and interview Nate many times and as much as I'd love to see him have success in the league, I don't want the Panthers to take a chance on him. He came to Ball State because the school was one of the few that said they would work with Nate because of his learning disorder, and there was a rumor going around that Nate didn't completely learn the playbook until half way through his sophomore year. I know he has the physical tools to get it done at the next level but trust me when he sits down with an NFL scout or coach, they are going to be turned off with the lack of substance your going to get when he opens his mouth. He’s just not all there. Bill Polian came to the Ball State game against Northern Illinois and I asked him about Nate, and he said that he needed another year. I'm rooting for him, but I don't think he's going to struggle at this level.

football exces dont care about any of that. as long as he is cool off the field and can play he will have a spot..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      Well, the Niners just doomed themselves to mediocrity

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      Um, no, just no. Bills, Chiefs, Chargers, Ravens, Bengals, Texans, Eagles, Commanders are 8 teams that it's not even a debate, they aren't trading their QB for Purdy. Patriots, Broncos, Titans, Giants, Bears, Vikings, Falcons are 7 more teams with QBs drafted in the last 2 years that also would rather stick with them than trade for Purdy as they all have more upside than he does. Lions, Packers, Cowboys, Bucs are 4 more that would likely keep their QB's as well, age aside for Goff, Dak, and Baker. Panthers and Colts are two teams in the same situation, QB's who have both struggled and shown flashes to where the teams probably stick with them because they drafted them, but in a re-draft of all QB's, they probably take Purdy over the guy they currently have. Jags, Cardinals, Dolphins, are 3 more with QB's who probably have a higher upside than Purdy but come with their own question marks, so debatable if they'd take Purdy over who they already have. That leaves Jets, Raiders, Steelers, Browns, Saints, Seahawks, and Rams. Rams would take him over Stafford for the future of course, but not for 2025, and I'd think the Seahawks would take him over Darnold, but honestly not sure if they would take him over Milroe at this moment as they really like his potential and have him for 4 years really cheap. That leaves 5 teams that I see who would absolutely take him over their current situation right now, and a handful of others who MIGHT take him over their current guy, a far cry from your 20.  
    • ForJimmy
      The Bryce Trade is Finally Complete. Who Won the Trade? Panthers vs Bears

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      Agreed. Also as soon as they received the top pick in the next draft it was over. Bears won that trade. Gave up a top overall pick got one the next year plus pick 9, a couple 2nds, and DJ Moore a proven young WR. Had their 2024 pick from us be in the late teens or later it would be more debatable IMO. 
    • Loyalty4Life
      Well, the Niners just doomed themselves to mediocrity

      By Loyalty4Life · Posted

      Option A:  Pay your starting QB starting QB money. Option B:  Look for a starting QB for 4-10 years (or longer) while wasting the talent at every other position.    How many of the top 20 QB's do you think are worth what they are being paid?   When you factor in the last year of his present deal his contract is really an average of 45 million per year which in today's QB market is a very, very good deal. I wish we'd had found a Brock Purdy to pay 50+ million a year right after we parted ways with Cam.  Ya'll go ahead and live in fairy tale land where good to great (much less elite) QB's are available to pay. Just the fact that they had the chance to pay Brock after the disaster of trading up for Lance is a testament that when you find a quarter back you can win with, complete in the playoffs and superbowls with, you pay him.  
×
×
  • Create New...