Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Tet McMillan: "I don't want to hear nothing"

TD alt

By TD alt,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

TD alt Mentor

TD alt

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Just now, bythenbrs said:

There's underwear fast and then there is game day fast.  Are we sure that he is game day fast?  Pro day 40's can be charitable to players.

I mean, we can say that about every player. Some Huddlers are digging out Warren even more. I see players who have been effective last season (Warren supremely so). I've seen relative speed in spurts, but like Dude intimated, when you have that size and ability to use that big body effectively, relatively good speed is some degree of a bonus. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
bythenbrs Grand Master

bythenbrs

Posted
Posted
19 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

4.48, 4.5, 4.55

I don’t think that matters for him. 

He is a skilled and big enough WR that he will be very productive and dangerous in the NFL. 

Truly curious.  Would you take him at 8 and if yes, what other players would have to be off the board to make you take him?  I have wavered back and forth on what players I would take him ahead of at 8.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PNW_PantherMan Grand Master

PNW_PantherMan

Posted
Posted

I think he will at worst be a productive NFL receiver, but I don't think there's any chance we draft him.  At this point, if there's not a public love letter about a prospect, they probably aren't even on our board.  I think there's next to a 0% chance that we draft McMillan or Warren.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
TD alt Mentor

TD alt

Posted
  • Author
Posted
17 minutes ago, scpanther22 said:

Isn't that x profile fake? lol

Huh?

5 minutes ago, Martin said:

So essentially he would have run ~4.65 at the combine. Kind of what was expected if I recall correctly. And good for his size.

Upon further research, there is a little bit of a controversy, as scouts there clocked him any where between 4.54-4.57 (still not super slow, but not fast either).

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
scpanther22 Proficient

scpanther22

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, TD alt said:

Huh?

Upon further research, there is a little bit of a controversy, as scouts there clocked him any where between 4.54-4.57 (still not super slow, but not fast either).

That x account isn't an actual NFL reporter just a random guy that bought the account 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
tukafan21 Grand Master

tukafan21

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, TD alt said:

Huh?

Upon further research, there is a little bit of a controversy, as scouts there clocked him any where between 4.54-4.57 (still not super slow, but not fast either).

So, you just want to add to the controversy with this post as well?

Because it's not correct either, as some had him timed as fast as 4.46.

There were 40 scouts there apparently, so yea, when they're all hand timing him, it's going to give you a wide range of possible times, but in the end, 40 times don't matter anyways.  Running a 4.46 or a 4.58 is basically all the same when his game isn't predicated on speed.

He has more than enough speed given all his other attributes he brings, which is all that matters in the end.

No, he's not a track star, but his size and hands are both 99th percentile amongst NFL WRs.  Which is why I don't get all the fan hand wringing over his speed, because it's just ignoring the things he can do that almost every other WR in the NFL can't do.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • cryrohit
      How to speak directly in Robinhood?[Get Robinhood Support].https://intercom.help/onkimo/en/articles/10876107-how-to-speak-directly-in-robinhood-get-r-b-d-support

      By cryrohit · Posted

      https://intercom.help/onkimo/en/articles/10876107-how-to-speak-directly-in-robinhood-get-r-b-d-support Want to speak to a real person on Robinhood?+1844-(569)-0700. It can be tricky, but here's how. First, navigate to the "Help"+1-844-(569)-0700. section within the app. Look for an option to contact support. Sometimes,+1844-(569)-0700. a "Call Us" button appears.+1-844-(569)-0700. If not, try searching for "phone support." Remember, direct phone lines can vary. You can also try calling +1844-(569)-0700. Be patient, as wait times can be long. For faster assistance, use the in-app chat or email support. +1844-(569)-0700. Alternatively, search Robinhood's website for their customer service contact details. +1844-(569)-0700.
    • cryrohit
      How to speak directly in Robinhood?[Get Robinhood Support]

      By cryrohit · Posted

      https://intercom.help/onkimo/en/articles/10862248-how-to-speak-directly-in-robinhood-get-robinhood-support Want to speak to a real person on Robinhood? It can be tricky,+1844-(569)-0700. but here's how. First, navigate to the "Help" section within the app. Look for an option to contact support. Sometimes,+1844-(569)-0700. a "Call Us" button appears. If not, try searching for "phone support."+1844-(569)-0700. Remember, direct phone lines can vary. You can also try calling +1844-(569)-0700. Be patient, as wait times can be long. For faster assistance, use the in-app chat or email support. +1844-(569)-0700. Alternatively, search Robinhood's website for their customer service contact details. +1844-(569)-0700. Did this answer your ques
    • Stumpy
      Power rankings

      By Stumpy · Posted

      Latest rankings from NYT/Athletic   They do some goofy Severence tie-in. But, basically pointing out each teams most consequential flaw/issue...   Our innies pored through the data in each team’s file, revealing one scary number that needs to be refined for reasons that are mysterious and important. ... 5. Carolina Hurricanes, 42-22-4 Last week: 7 Mark L. rank: 4 Dom L. rank: 5 -0.19 Andrei Svechnikov is in a drought. Since the beginning of February, Svechnikov has just one goal and six points in 11 games, 43 percent of the expected goals and has been outscored 9-5. His average Game Score — the scary number above — is one of the worst marks on the Hurricanes over that stretch. It’s clear something is up with Svechnikov considering he’s missed some time with injury, but it’s still a really tough stretch for a team that needs its stars to be stars. With Mikko Rantanen gone, the Hurricanes are back to needing more offensive punch and it doesn’t help that Svechnikov looked the way he did before injury. Can’t depend on Mark Jankowski scoring on every shot he takes forever, but maybe it’s time for Seth Jarvis to really step up on the top line.
×
×
  • Create New...